Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations RF Engineering Quizzes Notable Quotes Calculators Education Engineering Magazine Articles Engineering software RF Cafe Archives RF Cascade Workbook 2018 RF Symbols for Visio - Word Advertising RF Cafe Forums Magazine Sponsor RF Cafe RF Electronics Symbols for Visio RF Electronics Symbols for Office Word RF Electronics Stencils for Visio Sponsor Links Saturday Evening Post NEETS EW Radar Handbook Microwave Museum About RF Cafe Aegis Power Systems Anritsu Alliance Test Equipment Amplifier Solutions Anatech Electronics Axiom Test Equipment Berkeley Nucleonics Bittele Centric RF Conduct RF Copper Mountain Technologies Empower RF everything RF Exodus Advanced Communications Innovative Power Products ISOTEC KR Filters Lotus Systems PCB Directory Rigol RF Superstore San Francisco Circuits Reactel RFCT TotalTemp Technologies Triad RF Systems Windfreak Technologies Withwave LadyBug Technologies Wireless Telecom Group Sponsorship Rates RF Cafe Software Resources Vintage Magazines Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!
Anritsu Test Equipment - RF Cafe

Power Line Carrier - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2010 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at. Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

NOTICE: The original RF Cafe Forum is available again for reading, and the new RF Cafe Blog is an active board.

-- Amateur Radio

-- Anecdotes, Gripes, & Humor

-- Antennas

-- CAE, CAD, & Software

-- Circuits & Components

-- Employment & Interviews

-- Miscellany

-- Swap Shop

-- Systems

-- Test & Measurement

-- Webmaster

nubbage
 Post subject: Power Line Carrier
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:12 am 
 
General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:07 pm

Posts: 343

Location: London UK

How many amateurs out there are finding a general increase in background noise on the HF bands?

I am, and it isn't just PC clock noise. I am in a rural area with no ADSL nearby so it isn't that either. I suspect that trials of PLC might be started in UK. Does anyone know the status?


 
   
 
Ralph Zappa
 Post subject:
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:46 am 
 
Captain
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 6:43 pm

Posts: 17

Location: U.K.

Dear Mr. nubbage,

There have been some ramblings about PLC here in the UK. Seems not that long ago I read a story in one of the rags about solving that "Last Mile" issue with the beast. I am not one of the Amateur Radio faithful, but do sympathise with your dilemma. It just does not make sense to fill the air with digital radio noise when for decades we have done so much to try to alleviate the airborne clutter below 1 GHz. I shall keep my eyes open for "legitimate" stories on PLC here and try to remember to report on them.


 
   
 
wb9jtk
 Post subject:
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 1:00 pm 
 
General
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 5:39 pm

Posts: 58

In the U.S. of A. we call PLC "BPL" for "broadband over power line".

Late 2006 the Federal Communications Commission stated that BPL does not interfere with radio communications. Then they created a new rule that says that when BPL interferes with HF communications that licensed radio communications are FORBIDDEN to file complaints about the interference if the victim of interference is a mobile station no longer able to use the licensed service. This applies to ANY FCC licensed communications, whether aeronautical, marine, commercial, short-wave broadcast, weather facsimile transmissions, time and frequency standards etc etc.

A little information on the legal action against the F.C.C. for its alleged illegal ruling on BPL; https://www.arrl.org/forms/fdefense/

An ARRL article about the FCC stupidity; http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/02/01/100/?nc=1

In the U.S.A. the best collection of information is at the ARRL.org site.

This page is a repository of BPL relevant information in the U.S.A. kept by W1RFI at ARRL headquarters

http://p1k.arrl.org/~ehare/bpl/ex2.html

This is the database that the FCC required to be made public so that we would have advanced notice of the interference;

http://www.bpldatabase.org/

All BPL in the U.S.A. sorted by zipcode (so you do not have to type in code after code after code)

http://www.bpldatabase.org/listing/

A electric power company in Indiana posts information about their attempts at BPL.

http://www.sciremc.com/HighSpeedInterne ... fault.aspx

W1RFI visits the now-shut-down bpl trial near Miami and verifies measurements made by WB9JTK. See photos of BPL equipment;

http://www.pbase.com/drennon/bpl

BPL in Manassas, Virginia, USA. One of the worst spectrum polluters;

http://www.k4gvt.com/bpl/ This site has audio recordings of some BPL

A collection of RFI recordings to help you identify what might be the source of HF RFI; http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/rfi-noise/

[/b]


 
   
 
nubbage
 Post subject:
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:34 pm 
 
General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:07 pm

Posts: 343

Location: London UK

I had seen reference to the action on QRZ, but I did not realize quite how crassly the evidence against BPL/PLC had been ignored by the FCC.

One of the links you provided (the first ARRL one) mentions how few customers have signed up for BPL. But the aim of power transmission companies is not to operate a commercial telecom network. It is to justify launching the technology on the grounds it might benefit Joe public (which it clearly does not), but in reality what they are intending to do is install remote telemetry meter reading modems to reduce the cost of meter reading/billing.

In France I know of a rail line that runs for 30 miles through wooded countryside between a remote town and a major commercial center. Gaining approval to construct and operate it was achieved by claiming it was a "pro bono publico" line, benefiting thousands of commuters. After it was built there are only 400 users per day on a good day. What everyone knew, but no-one could breathe a word about, was that half way along the line was a nuclear plant that needed a rail line to ship out the nuclear waste. After the public service closes at mid-night, there are 4 trains during the night that pass through heavily populated townships. Oh my.


 
   
 
wb9jtk
 Post subject:
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 9:03 pm 
 
General
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 5:39 pm

Posts: 58

The FCC is telling us that BPL will not cause harmful interference to licensed communications.

I find it interesting that they say that, and then give a list of frequencies which must not be used by BPL systems.

They say it will not cause harmful interference to licensed communications, and then put in the rules some lists of geographical locations where it is prohibited so it will not cause interference.

The FCC says it will not cause harmful interference, then creates rule 15.611 C iii that says licensed mobile communications stations can not complain.

Reading federal regulations is quite tedious. I have posted the section(s) of 47CFR15 that pertain to BPL so that it is a bit easier to read. http://www.jtkcommunications.com/FCC-BPL-rules.aspx


 
   
 
wa8ihw
 Post subject:
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:53 am 
 
Lieutenant

Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:41 am

Posts: 1

Remember due to higher RF outputs we the licensed services radiate and can cause more harm to there systems, thus giving there customer a poor quality product. This debate will go on, the key is whether it will be profitable. The FCC is looking at how much of the bandwidth we occupy and how much of is dead air. Just more the reason to recruit young minds full of mush, and make radio interesting again. Work the bands, all of them

_________________

The internet is the CB radio of the 21st Century.

Posted  11/12/2012

RF Cascade Workbook 2018 - RF Cafe
Exodus Advanced Communications Best in Class RF Amplifier SSPAs
Berkeley Nucleonics Corporation - RF Cafe
Lotus Communication Systems Modular RF Component Building Blocks - RF Cafe
Windfreak Technologies Frequency Synthesizers - RF Cafe

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low−priced products, all of which I created.

These Are Available for Free

 

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster

Copyright: 1996 - 2024

Webmaster:

    Kirt Blattenberger,

    BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got Mail" when a new message arrived...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

AirplanesAndRockets.com