Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations RF Engineering Quizzes Notable Quotes Calculators Education Engineering Magazine Articles Engineering software RF Cafe Archives RF Cascade Workbook 2018 RF Symbols for Visio - Word Advertising RF Cafe Forums Magazine Sponsor RF Cafe RF Electronics Symbols for Visio RF Electronics Symbols for Office Word RF Electronics Stencils for Visio Sponsor Links Saturday Evening Post NEETS EW Radar Handbook Microwave Museum About RF Cafe Aegis Power Systems Anritsu Alliance Test Equipment Amplifier Solutions Anatech Electronics Axiom Test Equipment Berkeley Nucleonics Bittele Centric RF Conduct RF Copper Mountain Technologies Empower RF everything RF Exodus Advanced Communications Innovative Power Products ISOTEC KR Filters Lotus Systems PCB Directory Rigol RF Superstore San Francisco Circuits Reactel RFCT TotalTemp Technologies Triad RF Systems Windfreak Technologies Withwave LadyBug Technologies Wireless Telecom Group Sponsorship Rates RF Cafe Software Resources Vintage Magazines Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!
Boonton RF Power Measurement

printed antenna - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2010 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at. Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

NOTICE: The original RF Cafe Forum is available again for reading, and the new RF Cafe Blog is an active board.

-- Amateur Radio

-- Anecdotes, Gripes, & Humor

-- Antennas

-- CAE, CAD, & Software

-- Circuits & Components

-- Employment & Interviews

-- Miscellany

-- Swap Shop

-- Systems

-- Test & Measurement

-- Webmaster

 Post subject: printed antenna
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:23 pm 

Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:17 pm

Posts: 5

I am fairly new into antenna design as I have been mainly a RF guy for 4 years working on TX and RX circuits for cellular products and have ventured into the 2.4GHZ area now.

Question is I am trying to figure out the main advantages of having an antenna at 200ohms versus a 50ohm for 2.4Ghz.

From the tx or rx path I have a balun that converts the signal from 50ohm to 200ohm (this is from previous designer who left and i took over and he is overi n japan now). I have worked with cellular antenna and have always matched to 50ohms, just curiuos why for a 2.4GHz antenna it would be 200ohms.

any insight on starting this desing would be greatful as I am the only RF guy here and I am getting some antenna design books next week. Thanks for responses.

 Post subject:
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:51 pm 
The only reason that I can come up with is... that impedance (200 ohms) is just what that specific antenna type looks like. As you know, not all antennas are 50 ohms driving impedance, infact most arent, so you have to match to them. It just turns out that some standard kinds of antennas, like monopoles have a pretty low impedance to start with and can be used in 50 ohm systems without matching. Some patch antennas can look like 200 ohms due to the physics of the antenna.

In other words, there is no advantage to having a 200 ohm termination impedance specifically, but the antenna impedance is more driven by the type antenna and what kind of performance you need from an antenna pattern point of view. Matching is often secondary.

If you have a resistive 200 ohms, then consider yourself lucky, that's an easy match.

Good luck,


 Post subject: thanks
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:50 pm 

Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:17 pm

Posts: 5

thanks for the insight, I had the feeling that was the reasoning, just was not sure.

I appreciate the quick response.

 Post subject:
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 3:05 pm 
Also, just to add to the excellent comments, most antennas if not all, have reactance so the actaul impedance you are considering needs to take into account R + jX for matching to your system or calculating radiated power. If X is not minimized then radiated power is reduced. Of course there are other variables to consider in antenna design.

Posted  11/12/2012

Innovative Power Products Couplers
Innovative Power Products Passive RF Products - RF Cafe
Exodus Advanced Communications Best in Class RF Amplifier SSPAs

Lotus Communication Systems Modular RF Component Building Blocks - RF Cafe

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low−priced products, all of which I created.

These Are Available for Free


About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster

Copyright: 1996 - 2024


    Kirt Blattenberger,


RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got Mail" when a new message arrived...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website: