Differential Bandpass Filter Design - RF Cafe Forums

 RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2010 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at. Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts. NOTICE: The original RF Cafe Forum is available again for reading, and the new RF Cafe Blog is an active board. -- Antennas -- Systems

aron_coop

Post subject: Differential Bandpass Filter Design

Unread postPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 12:02 pm

Offline

Lieutenant

Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 11:35 am

Posts: 1

I am tring to design a differential BPF to be used in a grad school project. It's suppose to have a bandwidth of 5.2Ghz to 5.9Ghz, less than 1dB of loss, Input/output match less than -10dB and have more than 30dB's of rejection for the bands 2Ghz-2.5Ghz and 10Ghz-12Ghz.

I used the basic "T" equations to get my L and C values, athen built a Low-pass and a High-pass and cascaded them. To get the 30dB rejection I have to add additional stages on the Low-pass and High-pass filters. However, when I do this the bandwidth widens out to be greater than 5.2Ghz-5.9Ghz. Does anyone know why this is happening? And how can I correct this?

Also, here the equaltions that I used. They are for a "T" section, but I think they should work for a differential with some changes to the cap (take half the value) between the inductors for a LPF or to the inductor (double the value) between the caps on a HPF.

EQUATIONS:

LPF:

Fh=5.8Ghz, Fc=11.6Ghz, Z0=50Ohms

C=1/(pi*Z0*Fc) = 1/(3.14*50*11.6e9) = 0.55pF

L=(Z0)^2 * C = (50^2)(0.55pF) = 1.37nH

HPF:

Fh=5.2Ghz, Fc=10.4Ghz, Z0=50Ohms

C=1/(pi*Z0*Fc) = 1/(3.14*50*10.4e9) = 0.612pF

L=(Z0)^2 * C = (50^2)(0.612pF) = 1.53nH

Does anyone know if these equations are correct for a Differential BPF? And is the assumption of Fc = 2 Fh correct for a Differntial Circuit or just for the "T" model?

Thanks,

Aron

Top

Profile

I.R

Post subject:

Unread postPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 2:53 pm

Hi,

You will of course have to realize your filter with distributed elements. There are equations for transforming the capacitance and inductance values to physical dimensions of transmission lines. You can easily find these equations in a text book :idea:

The bandwidth can change because you change the characteristics of the filter when you add aditional sections. Do you take the Q element under consideration? You should use a design tool to synthesize your filter and by this you can save time and iterations.

I suggest Eagleware: This is a great design tool for distributed and lumped filters with synthesis and simulation capabilities.

The equations for the 'T' sections are:

LPF:

L=Zo/pi*fc

C=1/pi*Zo*fc

HPF:

L=Zo/4*pi*fc

C=1/4*pi*Zo*fc

When you realize the filter with transmission lines (micro-strip or another), you will have to define the substrate and from that to derive few properties: Er (the dielectric coefficient), Loss tangent, resisitivity etc... you will have to define those and consider them in your final stage of design in order to match to the filter's requirements.

I suggest you will use Rogers laminates 4350 or similar as the substrate due to its relatively low Er and stable characteristics.

Top

moe

Post subject: check out this web site

Unread postPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 4:38 pm

http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm/ap ... /791/ln/en

Top

Pi

Post subject:

Unread postPosted: Wed May 05, 2004 3:40 pm

there is an furmula. You can find out how many resonators you need for defined bandwith. What i can see these days, the engineers use software as crutches. Take a tea, switch off the computer, and start thinking. Purely theoretically. In my times we asked professor for consultation.

Top

to moe

Post subject:

Unread postPosted: Wed May 05, 2004 3:50 pm

some Maxim's appnotes are good. But only some. Maxim never was wireless company and therefore the datasheets are full of mistakes.

e.g. The don't know location of minimum noise figure impedance and s-parameters. They measure only IP2 to come up with +56dBm IP2 for LNAs and similar stuff..

Posted  11/12/2012