Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations RF Engineering Quizzes Notable Quotes Calculators Education Engineering Magazine Articles Engineering software RF Cafe Archives RF Cascade Workbook 2018 RF Symbols for Visio - Word Advertising RF Cafe Forums Magazine Sponsor RF Cafe RF Electronics Symbols for Visio RF Electronics Symbols for Office Word RF Electronics Stencils for Visio Sponsor Links Saturday Evening Post NEETS EW Radar Handbook Microwave Museum About RF Cafe Aegis Power Systems Anritsu Alliance Test Equipment Amplifier Solutions Anatech Electronics Axiom Test Equipment Berkeley Nucleonics Bittele Centric RF Conduct RF Copper Mountain Technologies Empower RF everything RF Exodus Advanced Communications Innovative Power Products ISOTEC KR Filters Lotus Systems PCB Directory Rigol RF Superstore San Francisco Circuits Reactel RFCT TotalTemp Technologies Triad RF Systems Windfreak Technologies Withwave LadyBug Technologies Wireless Telecom Group Sponsorship Rates RF Cafe Software Resources Vintage Magazines Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!
Axiom Test Equipment - RF Cafe

Please help dumb digital guy w/ FSK - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2010 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at. Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

NOTICE: The original RF Cafe Forum is available again for reading, and the new RF Cafe Blog is an active board.

-- Amateur Radio

-- Anecdotes, Gripes, & Humor

-- Antennas

-- CAE, CAD, & Software

-- Circuits & Components

-- Employment & Interviews

-- Miscellany

-- Swap Shop

-- Systems

-- Test & Measurement

-- Webmaster


Post subject: Please help dumb digital guy w/ FSK Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:24 pm


Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:52 pm

Posts: 3

I am trying to make the receiver portion of a Universal Access Transceiver (UAT). This is an FSK modulated data-link for aircraft. The specifics are as follows:

Frequency 978 MHz, +/- 20 PPM

Delta f/2 +312.5 kHz

-Delta f/2 -312.5 kHz

Modulation Type Continuous Phase FSK

Modulation Rate 1.041667 MBPS

Sensitivity -93 dBm

I know a lot of RF guys and all of them say “you can probably get a chip that does all that”. Or another quote is “They make a chip that does that”. Who is “They”? I have found several FSK/ASK chips that work up to about 920 MHz. I think these are designed for Keyless Entry, Car Alarms, Remote Controls and that sort of thing. It looks to me like I will have to make a circuit out of discrete components. I don't think this is a big deal but I am not sure how to get started. I think I can handle the gain and filtering portion and I can for sure handle the bit stream once it gets turned into ones and zeros, but I need help with the demodulation. Does anyone have any specific suggestions on how to build this type of circuit? Or can someone point me to a book? I am not too interested in communications theory as I am building a radio to a standard. I would really like a book with circuit ideas.

From the information I have been able to figure out on the web I have two ideas how to do the demodulation. I am guessing I am way off base so any constructive comments are welcome.

First idea:

Filter, amplify, down convert, split then pass each leg through a filter/rectifier and apply each leg to the input of a comparator.

Second idea: (and this is my lame idea)

Filter, amplify, down convert, then square up the signal w/ a comparator. Send the signal into a fast counter and use a CPLD to keep reading the counter to determine the frequency.

Thank you in advance,




Post subject: FSKPosted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:47 am


Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 3:51 pm

Posts: 104


While you might be able to get a chip to do what you want to do, I suspect the market isn't large enough for a specialized part.

You might be able to re-purpose chips for the cellular telephone market, but that's not at all a sure bet. And "consumer" devices have a deservedly bad reputation for being discontinued during the production life of industrial/commercial equipment. Still, you might browse through Qualcomm's offerings.

All of which puts you squarely in the "do it yourself" category.

Generally, the "best" way to demodulate FSK is with a phase-locked loop (PLL). For weak signals, this is best done by a receiver with the following stages:

Filter - amplifier -downconverter (mixer + oscillator) - amplifier - pll - comparator.


Filter - amplify - quadrature down-convert to DC, apply the two signals to an ADC, and demodulate using DSP.

(This isn't as unthinkable as all that - some of TI's TMS320C2000 series DSP's have multiple high-speed 10-bit ADC's built in, and still don't cost much.)

The front-end filters are critical. In most aircraft, there are several transmitters: voice, transponder, radar, etc. The signal from those must be reduced to the point where the FSK receiver low-noise amplifier doesn't overload. BUT, any loss in that filter adds dB-for-dB to the noise figure: bad news. Given that this isn't a unique system, some manufacturer of surface-acoustic-wave (SAW) filters might actually have one as a stock item.

LNA's are widely available as IC's from companies like RF Micro Devices, Mini-Circuits Labs, and others; and mixers/IF amplifiers are not hard to get. (Motorola used to make some nice ones - but they were discontinued when Mot spun out On Semi, then Freescale Semi.

You might even get a 74HC4046 to do the PLL job (ouch - I'm showing my age! Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain...)

Bear in mind that in the 900 MHz region, "breadboarding" is an art requiring minimal lead length, a good ground plane, and just plain luck, if you don't have experience. Many people just lay out a pcb, and plan on doing at least one revision.

By the way, the methods you mention are classics: the first one is generally referred to as a "discriminator" in the literature - of which there's a lot before PLL's took over. The second one is also a standard - implemented in analog (yes, an "analog counter"!), it's used in high-end audio. So your intuition isn't bad.

Me, if I were going to do the project, I'd take the DSP route - but that has its own challenges - particularly code efficiency.

Good Luck!




Post subject: Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:50 am


Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:52 pm

Posts: 3


Thank you for the input. What a great reply! Great news, I like the "do it yourself" category the best. I have about a million more questions for you. I wish I worked with you.

I downloaded a data sheet for the 74HC4046. I will read it and try to figure it out.

I though about trying to use a DSP but I thinking that with a bit rate of over 1 MBPS. I would have to sample at over two million samples per second. Is this correct? I am very comfortable writing low level micro code so if can be done this way that would be good.

Also I would like to thank you for you advice on the SAW filter. I will look into it.

Thanks again,

Bill Finnell



Post subject: FSKPosted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:09 am


Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 3:51 pm

Posts: 104


Well, maybe a TI '6000 series DSP would be better

If your speed were lower, Analog Devices has a transceiver chip - but it only goes up to 384 kbits/second - not enough. (ADF7025, I think - but you should check their website rather than depend on my ability to remember part numbers accurately...)

What kind of design constraints do you have? Size, power, cost? If cost, is it "cost-per-unit" or "cost-to-first-unit"? (That is, parts cost or development cost).

"You can have it good, fast, and cheap - pick 2..."

I'll try to write more later - but it's already too late.

Good Luck,




Post subject: Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:14 pm


Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:52 pm

Posts: 3

My target is “good and cheap”. I am paying for development out of pocket so I would like to keep that cost down although I realize nothing is free, especially good tools. And I would like to keep "cost-per-unit" down too so that I can keep the price down. Avionics are relatively expensive so I think I would like to keep parts down in the $100 or $200 range. The good news is I do have time.


Posted  11/12/2012

Anatech Electronics - RF Cafe
Exodus Advanced Communications Best in Class RF Amplifier SSPAs
Innovative Power Products Passive RF Products - RF Cafe
Exodus Advanced Communications Best in Class RF Amplifier SSPAs
Copper Mountain Technologies (VNA) - RF Cafe

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low−priced products, all of which I created.

These Are Available for Free


About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster

Copyright: 1996 - 2024


    Kirt Blattenberger,


RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got Mail" when a new message arrived...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website: