Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations RF Engineering Quizzes Notable Quotes Calculators Education Engineering Magazine Articles Engineering software RF Cafe Archives RF Cascade Workbook 2018 RF Symbols for Visio - Word Advertising RF Cafe Forums Magazine Sponsor RF Cafe RF Electronics Symbols for Visio RF Electronics Symbols for Office Word RF Electronics Stencils for Visio Sponsor Links Saturday Evening Post NEETS EW Radar Handbook Microwave Museum About RF Cafe Aegis Power Systems Anritsu Alliance Test Equipment Amplifier Solutions Anatech Electronics Axiom Test Equipment Berkeley Nucleonics Bittele Centric RF Conduct RF Copper Mountain Technologies Empower RF everything RF Exodus Advanced Communications Innovative Power Products ISOTEC KR Filters Lotus Systems PCB Directory Rigol RF Superstore San Francisco Circuits Reactel RFCT TotalTemp Technologies Triad RF Systems Windfreak Technologies Withwave LadyBug Technologies Wireless Telecom Group Sponsorship Rates RF Cafe Software Resources Vintage Magazines Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!
Anritsu Test Equipment - RF Cafe

What is your opinion of Qualcomm? - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2010 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at. Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

NOTICE: The original RF Cafe Forum is available again for reading, and the new RF Cafe Blog is an active board.

-- Amateur Radio

-- Anecdotes, Gripes, & Humor

-- Antennas

-- CAE, CAD, & Software

-- Circuits & Components

-- Employment & Interviews

-- Miscellany

-- Swap Shop

-- Systems

-- Test & Measurement

-- Webmaster

What is your opinion of Qualcomm?

Good - I work for them now or have in the past 32% [ 16 ]

Bad - I work for them now or have in the past 6% [ 3 ]

Good - I have only dealt with them 32% [ 16 ]

Bad - I have only dealt with them 30% [ 15 ]

Total votes : 50

Author Message

Kirt Blattenberger

Post subject: Qualcomm Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:57 pm

Site Admin

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 2:02 pm

Posts: 308

Location: Erie, PA

Please use your personal experience with Qualcomm when voting in the poll.

Thanks.

_________________

- Kirt Blattenberger

RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster

Top

Guest

Post subject: Way to goPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 2:09 am

Quote:

Please use your personal experience with either an interview or actual employment with Qualcomm when voting in the poll.

8D Thats the way it is done do you not think so.

Top

attenuator

Post subject: Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 12:43 am

Captain

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:29 pm

Posts: 13

This is a great company to work for. They have a attitude towards R&D that is second to none. I have worked for companies that had us using HP141T Spec Analyzers. Everyone in Engineering had to share a PC. OMG this was so counter productive. QC is quite different. Projects are well organized, and properly staffed. The PM's make sure that they are properly staffed, if a person in the group is a weak link they are not fired or mistreated but are encouraged to develop what ever skill they are lacking. They offer many perks that other companies don't. Such as Flex time, allowing you to pursue education while working. The company has a onsight gym, swimming pool. And the stock options have made many folks a nice little nestegg. The interviews are somewhat harsh, as I remember mine being a two day ordeal. 1 HR person and 6 Engineers.

One of the interviews seemed like a friendly get to know ya kind. Another one I was asked questions that for the life of me I wanted to smack the guy for asking. Later on I found out, that the purpose of the questions was not to see if I could get it right, but to see how I approached such a impossible problem. What I mean is, did I get flustered, how did I hold up, Did I use proper problem solving technique. The best part of the interviews was when it was over, and I went to my car and chain smoked about 2 packs of smokes, went home and finished a fifth of whiskey. Hehe just kidding but you get the idea. And oh yes they do check your references, so don't put down Dudly dooright in the Canada Mounties. Well I hope this helps any prospective QC employee.

Top

Guest

Post subject: Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:06 pm

To me Qualcomm = arrogant. The people I worked with seemed nice enough in interviews, but I later found them to be some of the most arrogant self-serving people I have ever had to deal with in my life.

Top

attenuator

Post subject: Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 2:23 am

Captain

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:29 pm

Posts: 13

Maybe little Johnny does not play well with others. Or perhaps you are insecure about your own inadequacies that made you feel so looked down upon. I found the employees to be your avg citizens. The people there were confident to be sure but not arrogant as you would say. Sounds like you are just bitter to me. So what project did you work on that made you feel the way you do?

Top

Kirt Blattenberger

Post subject: Very active thread on Qualcomm interviewsPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:31 am

Site Admin

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 2:02 pm

Posts: 308

Location: Erie, PA

Greetings:

There is a very active forum thread concerning interviewing at Qualcomm.

Obtaining a position with Qualcomm seems to have become the de facto litmus test of qualification as a worthy wireless communications engineer. Maybe they should adopt the U.S. marine Corps' slogan: "The Few. The Proud."

BTW, my wife's niece's husband worked there as a field engineer for about 4 years and liked the people and the environment. He did site surveys and installations for Qualcomm equipment all over the world, but mostly in South America. They hosed him, though, by laying him off in 2000 just months before his stock options were to be vested. Understandably, his attitude toward them was adjusted accordingly.

.

_________________

- Kirt Blattenberger

RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster

Top

Little Johnny

Post subject: Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:33 pm

attenuator wrote:

The people there were confident to be sure but not arrogant as you would say.

Dudly Dooright...I have to say it is very little minded of you to think all of the 7000+ employees are as you describe. I was simply describing those I encountered in the company to give people another view of Qualcomm, not the unrealistic "rosy" picture you have painted.

And you think I was looked down upon? That I'm bitter? You're a trip man. If I frequently went home and downed a fifth of whiskey like you, I think I would also be so disillusioned.

Top

attenuator

Post subject: Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 3:43 am

Captain

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:29 pm

Posts: 13

I never said the entire QC population was one particular way. And where did the Fifth of whiskey come from? I can easily polish off more than that.

Anyways why don't you tell us why you left QC.

Top

Guest

Post subject: Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:23 am

attenuator wrote:

I went to my car and chain smoked about 2 packs of smokes, went home and finished a fifth of whiskey.

Granted, you followed this up by saying you were joking. I'm not so sure though.

Top

attenuator

Post subject: Sour GrapesPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:30 pm

Captain

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:29 pm

Posts: 13

Yet for a second time you evade my question with your attempts to sling mud by quoting a metaphor that I used in a previous post. Are your points so weak that you must resort to such tactics of a desperate politician? I think you have said more than enough for the readers of this forum to conclude that your assesment of this company are based on a person who was unable to perform a job in a way that was expected, and as such you were probably dismissed.

Top

Guest

Post subject: Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 4:47 pm

Dudly Dooright: If you can't take the mudslinging, then maybe you shouldn't have started throwing mud in my direction in the first place. You really are a trip man. I left Qualcomm in good standing. My time there was productive and I am still gainfully employed in this industry. Your attempts at discrediting me are silly and hardly worthy of a response. Maybe you should put forth an effort to be more open minded of opinions that differ from your own. Laying off on the whiskey might be a good step in this direction.

Top

attenuator

Post subject: Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 1:57 am

Captain

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:29 pm

Posts: 13

Well, the whole point of this forum was for people to give an opinion of a company. I simply gave mine. As it is obvious you must troll around to create conflict as you did with you very close minded statement. To have the unmitigated effrontery to make a open blanket comment like

Quote:

I later found them to be some of the most arrogant self-serving people I have ever had to deal with in my life.

and then to say I started slinging mud and is close minded just baffles me. Why have you not posted your sentiments about QC sooner? Why did you wait intil someone else made comments about this company? Lets not be a hypocrite.

I refuse to continue in this pointless discussion with you. Lets leave it at, you have your opinion and I have mine. Have a very nice day.

Top

Guest

Post subject: Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 7:46 am

attenuator: Read the postings! You started this by attacking my credibility baselessly!

Nice how you quoted me out of context. The correct quote is this:

Anonymous wrote:

To me Qualcomm = arrogant. The people I worked with seemed nice enough in interviews, but I later found them to be some of the most arrogant self-serving people I have ever had to deal with in my life.

Clearly I was referrring to the people I was working with. How did you even get a job in Qualcomm? You're a moron!

Top

attenuator

Post subject: Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:07 pm

Captain

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:29 pm

Posts: 13

I suppose now We will resort to "I know you are but what am I" tactics. Geez fella get a grip, and grow up. Dude! do you even realize what you post?

Quote:

Clearly I was referrring to the people I was working with.

And you clearly wrote.

Quote:

To me Qualcomm = arrogant.

As a person employed there, I take that as an insult. You sir are rude, and speak with empty, exaggerated talk. Your clearly the one who should consider laying off of whatever substance your abusing. Furthermore I and as I am sure, the rest of the readers would appreciate, is if you would cease with your troll like behavior and crawl back under what ever bridge you came from. Since you are a troll, I am sure you will not stop without having the last word. With this I bid you a goodbye and happy trolling.[/quote]

Top

paul_bateman

Post subject: Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 7:27 pm

I have only dealt with them as i was interviewing for a Rf technician postion. During the 5+ hour interview they were praising the fact that i new so much about RF and that the other people interviewed did not know much about rf. At the end of the day they (supervisor + someone who's postion i do not recall) said i am a perfect fit and would be calling me with an offer.

I got a call alright ...from Hr saying they found somebody more qualifed, I asked how can that be and she could/would not answer

Ps on a side note for the longest time when we (me+the other technicians s who worked there and interviewed me) went out for lunch break i ordered a beer ( they said that the hardest part of the INT. was coming up so i needed to calm my nerves.) I figured i was going to pay + it was only other techs who were with me. WAS this wrong?

Top

prabhu_a

Post subject: Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 3:40 am

Captain

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 2:39 am

Posts: 6

hi attenuator

i was phone interveiwed by qualcomm for software intern position,i got mail next day mornin from them that they were impressed witt the results and wud conduct second technical phone interveiw this week,i want to know how different second intervew will be from first one bcoz both happen to be technical interveiws,will they go into subject in more depth?how many phone intevews they will conduct bfore callin for onsite interveiws?is the interveiw procedure nad difficulty level for internships is same as for full time position?

attenuator wrote:

This is a great company to work for. They have a attitude towards R&D that is second to none. I have worked for companies that had us using HP141T Spec Analyzers. Everyone in Engineering had to share a PC. OMG this was so counter productive. QC is quite different. Projects are well organized, and properly staffed. The PM's make sure that they are properly staffed, if a person in the group is a weak link they are not fired or mistreated but are encouraged to develop what ever skill they are lacking. They offer many perks that other companies don't. Such as Flex time, allowing you to pursue education while working. The company has a onsight gym, swimming pool. And the stock options have made many folks a nice little nestegg. The interviews are somewhat harsh, as I remember mine being a two day ordeal. 1 HR person and 6 Engineers.

One of the interviews seemed like a friendly get to know ya kind. Another one I was asked questions that for the life of me I wanted to smack the guy for asking. Later on I found out, that the purpose of the questions was not to see if I could get it right, but to see how I approached such a impossible problem. What I mean is, did I get flustered, how did I hold up, Did I use proper problem solving technique. The best part of the interviews was when it was over, and I went to my car and chain smoked about 2 packs of smokes, went home and finished a fifth of whiskey. Hehe just kidding but you get the idea. And oh yes they do check your references, so don't put down Dudly dooright in the Canada Mounties. Well I hope this helps any prospective QC employee.

Top

ttran

Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:11 am

Lieutenant

Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 11:17 am

Posts: 2

attenuator wrote:

This is a great company to work for. They have a attitude towards R&D that is second to none. I have worked for companies that had us using HP141T Spec Analyzers. Everyone in Engineering had to share a PC. OMG this was so counter productive. QC is quite different. Projects are well organized, and properly staffed. The PM's make sure that they are properly staffed, if a person in the group is a weak link they are not fired or mistreated but are encouraged to develop what ever skill they are lacking. They offer many perks that other companies don't. Such as Flex time, allowing you to pursue education while working. The company has a onsight gym, swimming pool. And the stock options have made many folks a nice little nestegg. The interviews are somewhat harsh, as I remember mine being a two day ordeal. 1 HR person and 6 Engineers.

One of the interviews seemed like a friendly get to know ya kind. Another one I was asked questions that for the life of me I wanted to smack the guy for asking. Later on I found out, that the purpose of the questions was not to see if I could get it right, but to see how I approached such a impossible problem. What I mean is, did I get flustered, how did I hold up, Did I use proper problem solving technique. The best part of the interviews was when it was over, and I went to my car and chain smoked about 2 packs of smokes, went home and finished a fifth of whiskey. Hehe just kidding but you get the idea. And oh yes they do check your references, so don't put down Dudly dooright in the Canada Mounties. Well I hope this helps any prospective QC employee.

I worked at Qualcomm from 1991-2001. I had two on-site interviews recently (March 06), to which I was told both teams wanted me. Had they, at least, matched my current pay, I would have come working for them. I was offered almost 12K less in salary and told that was the most they would dish out. Needless to say, I said no.

Captain, are you still working there?

T

Top

ttran

Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:13 am

Lieutenant

Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 11:17 am

Posts: 2

ttran wrote:

attenuator wrote:

This is a great company to work for. They have a attitude towards R&D that is second to none. I have worked for companies that had us using HP141T Spec Analyzers. Everyone in Engineering had to share a PC. OMG this was so counter productive. QC is quite different. Projects are well organized, and properly staffed. The PM's make sure that they are properly staffed, if a person in the group is a weak link they are not fired or mistreated but are encouraged to develop what ever skill they are lacking. They offer many perks that other companies don't. Such as Flex time, allowing you to pursue education while working. The company has a onsight gym, swimming pool. And the stock options have made many folks a nice little nestegg. The interviews are somewhat harsh, as I remember mine being a two day ordeal. 1 HR person and 6 Engineers.

One of the interviews seemed like a friendly get to know ya kind. Another one I was asked questions that for the life of me I wanted to smack the guy for asking. Later on I found out, that the purpose of the questions was not to see if I could get it right, but to see how I approached such a impossible problem. What I mean is, did I get flustered, how did I hold up, Did I use proper problem solving technique. The best part of the interviews was when it was over, and I went to my car and chain smoked about 2 packs of smokes, went home and finished a fifth of whiskey. Hehe just kidding but you get the idea. And oh yes they do check your references, so don't put down Dudly dooright in the Canada Mounties. Well I hope this helps any prospective QC employee.

I worked at Qualcomm from 1991-2001. I had two on-site interviews recently (March 06), to which I was told both teams wanted me. Had they, at least, matched my current pay, I would have come working for them. I was offered almost 12K less in salary and told that was the most they would dish out. Needless to say, I said no.

Captain, are you still working there?

T

I meant Attenuator...not captain.

Top

quakquak

Post subject: Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 12:14 pm

anyone works there?

Top

tryinghard

Post subject: R&D groupPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:25 pm

Lieutenant

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:20 pm

Posts: 1

I had a phone interview with the R&D group, the guy was very knowledgeable, but I couldn't show my analytical skills on the phone, I am a board guy who likes to hash it out.

Anyways I am waiting for a decision to be called onsite. I am not sure how long they take.

R..

Posted  11/12/2012

Anatech Electronics (RF Filters) - RF Cafe
Holzworth RF Synthesizers
everythingRF RF & Microwave Parts Database - RF Cafe
Windfreak Technologies Frequency Synthesizers - RF Cafe

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low−priced products, all of which I created.

These Are Available for Free

 

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster

Copyright: 1996 - 2024

Webmaster:

    Kirt Blattenberger,

    BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got Mail" when a new message arrived...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

AirplanesAndRockets.com