Refusing to Suffer Fools
Something I was reading the other day reminded me
of the ridiculous antics that a few companies I worked for have performed in an attempt to
adopt the attitude du jour on the proper way to run a business. Probably the most outrageous
example comes from a satellite earth station system design company in the last century, but
there were other notables.
Back in the mid-to-late 1990s, the in-vogue practice for companies was the shedding of
old ways of doing things - you know, those things that for most places had worked so well
- and adopting a new philosophy. After all, the world was changing rapidly for the better;
our president even boldly declared "the end of the traditional business cycle." The chairman
of the Federal Reserve admonished investors to beware the feelings of "irrational exuberance,"
but business titans continued to race forward at full tilt. After all, in such bountiful times
when nothing could go wrong, what would be the harm in testing any and all new ideas? From
my perspective, it was basically an avant-garde management style that required a new way for
employees to think about themselves and the company. A "new paradigm," it was called. That
word paradigm imposed itself into the lexicon of a workforce that largely could not
even spell "paradigm," let alone understand its significance. Personally, the word I associated
with the rapidly progressing, omnipresent force was "dubious." I just never bought into the
hype, and did not fully trust those who did.
It was the era of the Tech Bubble inflation, so of course any company that didn't buy into
the de facto philosophy was doomed to failure, either from outdated procedures or from being
placed on an unofficial black listing. Your company must have been being run by a bunch of
Neanderthals if it was not yet on the roster of companies who had paid tens or hundreds of
thousands of dollars to self-proclaimed expert consulting companies that would assure your
placement on that list. In retrospect, we all know how that whole thing turned out - everything
came crashing down in the Spring of 2000. So much for the new paradigm.
And now, "the rest of the story," as Paul Harvey would famously say.
By far the most egregious example of said managerial tom foolery, in my personal experience,
was with the aforementioned company in Colorado. It was not the most efficient company for
which I have ever worked, but the people were hard-working and they had a good cadre of engineers,
technicians, and group-level managers. My manager's manager and I got along very well, so
I had access to him on matters other than just my current assignment (which was designing
up/down links for S-band and C-band transceiver racks and antenna plumbing). He let me know
about the impending changes, from which nobody would be exempt.
Fortunately, enough time has passed that I do not recall all of the idiocy that ensued
on the personal level, but I vividly recall the final, company-wide presentation at the end.
It was a real grand finale. Remember while reading what comes next that a popular consulting
firm was paid (from what I was told) more than $100k to do this.
We were all assembled into a formal meeting hall with a banquet of sandwiches and fruit,
pastries, coffee, sodas, the works. After being properly nourished, we filed into the auditorium
and sat in a theater area in the front of which was a large stage. The division president
(CEO, head honcho, whatever) made a few short opening comments, and then the lights began
A door opened in the back, behind all the rows of seats, a ray of light shone through the
opening, and then, attired in black funeral garb, in filed the entire management staff, some
bearing the palls of a large casket. As the somber, eerie music played, the troupe made its
way ceremoniously down the aisle and up onto center stage. While all eyes were on the aisle
performance, someone had placed a casket hoist - the kind used to lower the casket into a
grave - on the stage. There the pall bearers dutifully and lovingly placed the casket. Last
rites were pronounced, and the prez delivered a eulogy.
Who had died, you might wonder? No who, but what. The old
way, yesterday, the bygone, a foretime, auld lang syne, that which was. Old practices had
assumed room temperature. Farewell, and good riddance.
Suddenly, the casket sprang open and a resurrected New Way emerged, full of life, as a
promise of hope to everyone in the room. Mr. CEO burst forth in a now joyous tone, heaping
praise upon this new opportunity that was being given the Company, and exalting the One who
had made it possible. Yes, the One was the consulting firm's founder and his faithful staff
that made it all happen.
Aside from the fact that the parody was probably offensive to some of the more religious
folks in the audience, the entire menagerie that ensued led up to a mockery of the hard work
those people had put into building their company. It seemed both insulting and vacuous. I
was embarrassed for everyone. Having only been there for a few months, it really didn't attack
me personally, but a lot of dedicated people who labored intensely were taken down a notch
or two by it.
My manager's manager played his role in the production magnificently, in fact, he came
across as well as a professional actor. Afterward, he admitted that he was somewhat insulted
by the entire process, but his job was to assist higher level managers in accomplishing their
vision for the company. I left the company a few months later.
The first, although not as severe, instance of that "new paradigm" thing that I can remember
occurred at a company where I worked in the early 1990s. Its employees had birthed the company
out of a small R&D effort of a larger company. The system they developed was ground-breaking
for the day, and worked extremely well. It was a good mix of RF, analog, digital, mechanical,
and software engineering all in one products (actually a set of products) that did one thing
with almost magical efficiency.
As is all too often the case, a larger company bought them and decided it had a better
idea (no it wasn't Ford). New top-level management was eventually installed locally (the mother
ship was in a different state), and along with it, new ideas. Hmmm, this is beginning to sound
like I have something against Management, but I really don't - at least not at the local level.
In fact, I have always had high regard for lower and mid-level managers.
In this instance, the imposed new philosophy required a sort of internal and self-reflectance
by every employee. e were required to write formal assessments of our own professional performance
and of our personal impressions of ourselves. The professional part I could sort of support,
since it is good to take a step back and look at your own professional goals and accomplishments,
as well as failures. Even the personal assessment was almost acceptable, but then they really
crossed the line.
We were corralled into meeting rooms in groups of 10 or 12 people, and were told to write
out our impressions of everyone else in the room, including positive and negative behaviors.
Anonymity was promised, in hopes of motivating people to open up with honest feelings. There
was absolutely no way that I was going to sit there amongst people I work with on a daily
basis, and many of whom I had great respect, and criticize they way they behave. If someone
repeatedly does something that I cannot tolerate, I will either confront him/her, or seek
a different assignment. If necessary, I'll leave the company, but I was not about to risk
embarrassing someone in a captive environment. Seemingly trivial things can devastate a person
who is openly or secretly hypersensitive to how other people perceive them. It was cruel and
I know when it was my assessment being read, because when it came to the criticizing part,
the only thing for the reader to echo from my paper was something along the lines of, "I choose
to not criticize my fellow workmates in this venue." It got real quiet in the room at that
point. I had signed my name, so that there was no question as to who had been uncooperative,
but it was not made public.
As it turned out, nobody delivered any form of truly scathing criticism of anyone else,
but then that really proved the folly of the entire exercise because surely with that many
people who interact five days a week, there were things that could have been said that would
result in hurt feelings. Full and open honesty is not always the best policy when it comes
to harming people without cause. I really liked the people there.
Case #3 comes from yet another early adopter company (I've worked at a lot of companies).
There, I experienced my first exposure to the "group hug" philosophy. For weeks I successfully
avoided participating in the meetings, but finally I was ordered to go. Reluctantly, I stopped
work on the airborne ECM receiver system that I designed and was testing (which was requiring
about 60 hours/week for a couple months) to go to the session. I was fuming mad. When I arrived
at the assigned meeting room, through the window in the door I could see everyone standing
in a circle, holding hands, all eyes closed. I almost threw up. I walked in while they were
all chanting "om," (might have been something else) signed my name to the attendance sheet,
and left. Nobody ever questioned me about it, and I never mentioned what I had done.
There have been a few other minor similar episodes, but as the decade went on, the fervor
or was it a fever) gradually petered out. Its collective damage had been done, but a lot of
people got rich off the scam.
One common thread that runs through all those companies was that they all obtained the
majority of their revenue from government contracts, either defense or national security.
Maybe it was just that during that era, those were the only types of companies for which I
worked. Can anyone provide instances of the same disease infecting commercial companies during
Flash forward half a decade, and I found myself working as an RF applications engineer
for a company I consider to be by far the finest, most down-to-earth corporation with which
I have ever had the privilege of associating. The founders, a couple RF engineers and a wizard
of sales guy (who is also a Ham, BTW), built an industry-leading company from the ground up,
and put together a crackerjack team to launch the company into stardom. Opening their doors
in a small business park around 1992, the vast majority (other than those who have retired)
of the first 50 employees still work there. Everyone I worked with was top-notch, whether
in RFIC design, production test, sales, HR, accounting, procurement, or shipping.
They treated me extremely well, so much so that I stuck around for 6-1/2 years. Never in
the entire time was any idiotic feel-good program imposed upon the employees - the founders
would never approve of it for themselves or the employees whom they valued highly. I left
only because RF Cafe was consuming so much of my time that I had to decide between neglecting
the website, or neglecting the full-time job for which I was being paid generously to perform.
I took the pay cut in order to tend to RF Cafe full time.
It was a fine way to end my tenure in the corporate engineering realm.
Having been out of the corporate world for three years, I have lost touch with current
trends in such shenanigans. If you send me your examples (no company names, please), I will
be glad to post them.
Posted July 13, 2010
A huge collection of my 'Factoids' can be accessed from my 'Kirt's Cogitations'
table of contents.
Topical Smorgasbord, another manifestation of Factoids,
are be found on these pages:
| 2 |
4 | 5
| 6 | 7
| 8 | 9
| 10 |
11 | 12 |
13 | 14
| 15 |
16 | 17 |
18 | 19
| 20 |
21 | 22
| 23 |
24 | 25 |
26 | 27
| 28 |
29 | 30 |
31 | 32
| 33 |
34 | 35 |
All pertain to topics that are related to the general engineering and science theme
of RF Cafe.