January 1935 Short Wave Craft
[Table of Contents]
People old and young enjoy waxing nostalgic about and learning some of the history of early electronics.
Short Wave Craft was published from 1930 through 1936. All copyrights are hereby acknowledged. See all articles
from Short Wave Craft.
There are many designs for
multiple-wavelength antennas available. Some use resonant 'traps' and specific length sections of
lines to change the effective RF length according to specific frequency bands, and others employ
complex phasing of multiple antennas to a single-point feed. Doing so allows operation across bands
that do not necessarily fall within or close enough to harmonic ratios, while still presenting
decent VSWR to the transceiver for acceptable performance. Still, nothing beats a single, finely
tuned antenna for each band of operation, or for that matter an antenna whose length is trimmed to
operate at peak efficiency even within sub-bands. It is possible to 'match' just about any antenna
impedance to a transmission line and transceiver, there will always be loses in efficiency and thus
loss in power due to resistive losses in matching networks and transmission lines (where reflected
power is dissipated). This arrangement of a continuously variable length wire antenna is one answer
to the problem. It takes a bit of mechanical aptitude and a willingness to adjust the length with
each frequency change, but after the initial calibration you simply adjust it to marked points.
Designing a fully automatic electromechanical version is well within the skill set of many Hams.
A Variable Wavelength Antenna
Interesting details of the construction followed in building
a variable wavelength antenna are illustrated above.
In the early days of short-wave reception every amateur dreamed of having efficient tuning condensers
which would be smoothly and silently variable; then came the variable grid-leak, volume control, and
now variable-mu valves.
This desire to have various features of variable value has caused attention to be directed to the
aerial used for short-wave reception, the idea being to have the aerial of such a length that it favors
a certain wavelength or band of wavelengths.
The natural wavelength of any aerial depends primarily on its length, and the wavelength (in meters)
can be found by multiplying its length in feet by 0.3 and the result by 4. For example, an aerial 50
feet long has a natural wavelength of 50 x 0.3 x 4 = 60 meters, or, if we wish to know what length of
wire to use in order to obtain a given natural wavelength, we must multiply the number in meters by
3.3 and divide the result by 4. Thus, if we require an aerial with a natural wavelength of 30 meters,
the length of wire required will be (30 x 3.3) / 4 = 24.75 feet or 24 feet 9 inches.
The following table (obtained by the above method) will give a close idea as to the different aerial
lengths required to cover the waveband between 10 and 80 meters, the usual range covered by most dual-range
tuning coils for short-wave work:
Natural wavelength in meters
Length of wire in feet
The free end of the aerial wire is provided with two egg-type insulators, a coiled spring and another
insulator, to which is attached the hauling rope or line which passes over the top pulley - fixed to
the usual wireless pole at the far end of the garden - down the pole, round the lower pulley and thence
back to the house where it is secured, within easy reach.
With the aerial extended to 14 feet - equivalent to a natural wavelength of 16.8 meters by the formulae
given - the Empire transmitter for the African zone was picked up at fair loudspeaker strength but subject
to fading. Extending the aerial another 9 feet gave a length of 23 feet, corresponding to a natural
wavelength of 27.6 meters. The same transmission was tuned in again and found to be louder, with fading
not so deep. The volume dropping to a comfortable loudspeaker strength, while the peak strength between
fades was much greater than ever obtained before. Experiments on other parts of the waveband have shown
that reception is improved by adjusting the length of the aerial. - World Radio.
(In this article the author referring to "natural wavelength" means the greatest wavelength at which
a grounded antenna will function. In his meter-to-feet conversion he uses 3.3 as a factor instead of
3.28. These calculations are near enough for "receiving" purposes but will not serve for computing dimensions
of transmitting antennas. - Editor)
Posted February 3, 2017