Copyright: 1996 - 2024
BSEE - KB3UON
RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling
2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed
formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit
design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at
the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps
while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got
Mail" when a new message arrived...
All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images
and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.
My Hobby Website:
CPWG Line width and spacings - RF Cafe Forums
RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2012 mainly due to other social media
platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around
August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and
Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe
Forums activity dropped off precipitously. If the folks at
phpBB would release a version with integrated
sign-in from the major social media platforms, I would resurrect the RF Cafe Forums,
but until then it is probably not worth the effort. Regardless, there are still
lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at.
Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.
|-- Amateur Radio
Gripes & Humor
-- CAE, CAD, &
Test & Measurement
Post subject: CPWG Line width and spacings Posted:
Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:18 am
Joined: Wed Aug
16, 2006 8:20 am
I am using
a CPWG topology for one of my board design. I find that line width of
40 mil with 18 mils spacing from adjoining ground on a 20 mil Rogers
4350 substrate gives a 50 ohm impedance. Similarly a 20 mil wide trace
with spacing of 5 mils also yields 50 ohm for same 20 mil thick substrate.
To take advantage of the low loss offered by a 40 mil trace
I went for this choice. While the components in the RF portion (3 GHz
to 7 GHz) of the design were easily routed with this trace width, the
components in Base Band section (DC to 250 MHz) had inputs and output
which run parallel to each other. This makes using 40 mil wide trace
with 20 mil ground spacing difficult. however I can accommodate the
20 mil wide and 5 mil spacing easily.
Has anyone ever used two different
CPWG dimensions on the same PCB. Also would it be a good idea to do
so. The main IC creating problem is HMC626LP5 from Hittite. It is a
VGA with an Attenuator between two amplifiers. the input and output
of each amplifier are on same side separated by a single Ground pin.
Design Engineer- RF
Post subject: Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:30
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
be no problem to route the signal lines in the configuration you mentioned
as long as it gives 50-ohm impedance. For the control signal you can
use 5mil lines as they require no specific impedance.
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jan 12,
2009 2:17 am
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:20
Thanks for your