Triad RF Systems
Berkeley Nucleonics Academy RF Boot Camp - RF Cafe
 

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster

Copyright: 1996 - 2024
Webmaster:
    Kirt Blattenberger,

    BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got Mail" when a new message arrived...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

AirplanesAndRockets.com

Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations RF Engineering Quizzes Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Engineering magazine articles Engineering software Engineering smorgasbord RF Cafe Archives RF Cascade Workbook 2018 RF Symbols for Visio - Word Advertising RF Cafe Homepage Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!
Innovative Power Products Couplers

Differential Bandpass Filter Design - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2012 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. If the folks at phpBB would release a version with integrated sign-in from the major social media platforms, I would resurrect the RF Cafe Forums, but until then it is probably not worth the effort. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

aron_coop
Post subject: Differential Bandpass Filter Design
Unread postPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 12:02 pm
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 11:35 am
Posts: 1
I am tring to design a differential BPF to be used in a grad school project. It's suppose to have a bandwidth of 5.2Ghz to 5.9Ghz, less than 1dB of loss, Input/output match less than -10dB and have more than 30dB's of rejection for the bands 2Ghz-2.5Ghz and 10Ghz-12Ghz.

I used the basic "T" equations to get my L and C values, athen built a Low-pass and a High-pass and cascaded them. To get the 30dB rejection I have to add additional stages on the Low-pass and High-pass filters. However, when I do this the bandwidth widens out to be greater than 5.2Ghz-5.9Ghz. Does anyone know why this is happening? And how can I correct this?

Can some please help or advise.

Also, here the equaltions that I used. They are for a "T" section, but I think they should work for a differential with some changes to the cap (take half the value) between the inductors for a LPF or to the inductor (double the value) between the caps on a HPF.

EQUATIONS:
LPF:
Fh=5.8Ghz, Fc=11.6Ghz, Z0=50Ohms

C=1/(pi*Z0*Fc) = 1/(3.14*50*11.6e9) = 0.55pF
L=(Z0)^2 * C = (50^2)(0.55pF) = 1.37nH

HPF:
Fh=5.2Ghz, Fc=10.4Ghz, Z0=50Ohms

C=1/(pi*Z0*Fc) = 1/(3.14*50*10.4e9) = 0.612pF
L=(Z0)^2 * C = (50^2)(0.612pF) = 1.53nH


Does anyone know if these equations are correct for a Differential BPF? And is the assumption of Fc = 2 Fh correct for a Differntial Circuit or just for the "T" model?

Thanks,
Aron


Top
Profile

I.R
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 2:53 pm

Hi,

You will of course have to realize your filter with distributed elements. There are equations for transforming the capacitance and inductance values to physical dimensions of transmission lines. You can easily find these equations in a text book :idea:

The bandwidth can change because you change the characteristics of the filter when you add aditional sections. Do you take the Q element under consideration? You should use a design tool to synthesize your filter and by this you can save time and iterations.

I suggest Eagleware: This is a great design tool for distributed and lumped filters with synthesis and simulation capabilities.
The equations for the 'T' sections are:

LPF:

L=Zo/pi*fc
C=1/pi*Zo*fc

HPF:

L=Zo/4*pi*fc
C=1/4*pi*Zo*fc


When you realize the filter with transmission lines (micro-strip or another), you will have to define the substrate and from that to derive few properties: Er (the dielectric coefficient), Loss tangent, resisitivity etc... you will have to define those and consider them in your final stage of design in order to match to the filter's requirements.

I suggest you will use Rogers laminates 4350 or similar as the substrate due to its relatively low Er and stable characteristics.


Top


moe
Post subject: check out this web site
Unread postPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 4:38 pm

http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm/ap ... /791/ln/en


Top


Pi
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed May 05, 2004 3:40 pm

there is an furmula. You can find out how many resonators you need for defined bandwith. What i can see these days, the engineers use software as crutches. Take a tea, switch off the computer, and start thinking. Purely theoretically. In my times we asked professor for consultation.

If you add additional 50 resonators, it might be even wider.


Top


to moe
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed May 05, 2004 3:50 pm

some Maxim's appnotes are good. But only some. Maxim never was wireless company and therefore the datasheets are full of mistakes.
e.g. The don't know location of minimum noise figure impedance and s-parameters. They measure only IP2 to come up with +56dBm IP2 for LNAs and similar stuff..



Posted  11/12/2012
TotalTemp Technologies (Thermal Platforms) - RF Cafe
RF Electronics Shapes, Stencils for Office, Visio by RF Cafe
RF Cascade Workbook 2018 by RF CafeCafe
 

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low−priced products, all of which I created.

These Are Available for Free