RF Cascade Workbook 2018 by RF Cafe
Berkeley Nucleonics Academy RF Boot Camp - RF Cafe
 

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster

Copyright: 1996 - 2024
Webmaster:
    Kirt Blattenberger,

    BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got Mail" when a new message arrived...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

AirplanesAndRockets.com

Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations RF Engineering Quizzes Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Engineering magazine articles Engineering software Engineering smorgasbord RF Cafe Archives RF Cascade Workbook 2018 RF Symbols for Visio - Word Advertising RF Cafe Homepage Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!
everythingRF RF & Microwave Parts Database (h2) - RF Cafe

Distribution of VCO - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2012 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. If the folks at phpBB would release a version with integrated sign-in from the major social media platforms, I would resurrect the RF Cafe Forums, but until then it is probably not worth the effort. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

gui076
Post subject: Distribution of VCO Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 4:40 am

Captain

Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 9:56 am
Posts: 15
Location: France
Hello,

i'm implementing a synthesizer with one or more VCO.

I will put some switch in order to choose between the VCOs and after i would like to provide VCO's signal to two Mixers.

I have seen some application with dual VCO buffer, is there other method ?

Thanks

Guillaume


Top

nubbage
Post subject: Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:33 am

General


Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:07 pm
Posts: 218
Location: London UK
Hi Guillaume
I have to split the VCO output of my synthesizer into a -10dBm signal for the pre-scaler and a direct signal at 0dBm into the VCO buffer followed by a mixer.
I just use a 10dB coaxial directional coupler on the VCO output.
If the buffer isolation into the mixer is inadequate, I also purchased a coaxial isolator. The VCO runs at 1.3GHz.
I only have the one VCO running. If I were to design for a second one to cover a wider range, I would use a coaxial transfer latching relay. This would ensure the idle VCO saw a matched load when de-selected.


Top

gui076
Post subject: Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:31 am

Captain

Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 9:56 am
Posts: 15
Location: France
Hi nubbage,

For my application it's to drive two mixers and they have 0 dBm LO input, so i thought a buffer will level the output to 0 dBm.
I have a wideband VCO 950-2050 and isolators wille be too narrow i think.

For the switch i have seen SP2T Absorbtive :
http://www.macom.com/DataSheets/SW65-0313.pdf

I didn't know "coaxial transfer latching relay".

Thank you for your help, i'm student in RF so i'm discovering a lot of thing

Guillaume


Top

FSomma
Post subject: Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:54 pm
Hi Guillaume

I think you can use the Tyco switch if you turn off the idle VCO with the same switch control signals .. In fact, I think it could be a good design practice to turn off the idle VCOs to ensure that you don´t have that tones around your circuit while the other VCO is active.

If your idea is to feed the dwn conv mixer and the up conv mixer with the same LO, you can use an splitter to feed them. If the isolation is critical (check the isolation balance of the RF-LO of both mixers and the splitter S32), you can think on changing the selected switch by an other one with no internal driver, and to boost up the LO for the mixers, you can use independent drivers on each output of the splitter to take advantage of their reverse isolation.


Top

gui076
Post subject: Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 5:22 pm

Captain

Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 9:56 am
Posts: 15
Location: France
Hi,

Yes the goal is to feed the up and down mixers.

So if i have well understood i should try this config :

VCO1 and VCO2 on SP2T followed by a splitter and one buffer on each channel.

Else there is a double VCO buffer from Maxim :
http://www.maxim-ic.com/quick_view2.cfm/qv_pk/2038/t/al

Thank you

Guillaume


Top

nubbage
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 6:54 am

General


Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:07 pm
Posts: 218
Location: London UK
Hi Guillaume
A latching coax relay is one that is magnetically biassed so when an impulse is given to the coil it switches over to the other state. Removing the coil drive leaves it in that state until another pulse is received. This avoids the need to drive current continuously into the coil for either state of the relay. I think mine is from MAComm/Tyco. The isolation of a transfer switch, a relay that transfers the unwanted signal to a load and the wanted signal to the output port, is typically greater than 60dB, so leakage should not be a problem.
I hope not to use the isolator I purchased. It was just for insurance "in case". The bandwidth is 20% of nominal centre. I think it was from Anzac.
I have some doubts about the wisdom of switching off the unwanted VCO, particularly if low phase noise and rapid switching time are important.


Top

FSomma
Post subject: Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 3:44 pm
Hi Guillaume,

Yes, the "VCO1 and VCO2 on SP2T followed by a splitter and one buffer on each channel" is one option.

But if you don´t need that much isolation, you can still think on the "VCO1 and VCO2 on SP2T followed by the buffer you where thinking on the first place and a splitter to OL-feed the mixers".

Regarding to switching off the idle VCO, yes, nubbage is right, you have to analyze your phase noise and rapid switching time requirements. I think I assumed too quickly that your application was a channel scanner (am I right?) where fast VCO switching is not that important... i mean, you can scarify that response time when you switch from band to band and save $$ to your design, coax relay are very expensive, Radiall has some SMD low power coax relays that you might like to take a view if you find it necessary.

Take care




Posted  11/12/2012
TotalTemp Technologies (Thermal Platforms) - RF Cafe
Werbel Microwave - RF Cafe
RF Electronics Shapes, Stencils for Office, Visio by RF Cafe
 

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low−priced products, all of which I created.

These Are Available for Free