Triad RF Systems
Windfreak Technologies

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster

Copyright: 1996 - 2024
    Kirt Blattenberger,


RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got Mail" when a new message arrived...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations RF Engineering Quizzes Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Engineering magazine articles Engineering software Engineering smorgasbord RF Cafe Archives RF Cascade Workbook 2018 RF Symbols for Visio - Word Advertising RF Cafe Homepage Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!
Innovative Power Products Couplers

Gain and bandwidth - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2012 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. If the folks at phpBB would release a version with integrated sign-in from the major social media platforms, I would resurrect the RF Cafe Forums, but until then it is probably not worth the effort. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

Post subject: Gain and bandwidth
Unread postPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:11 am

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17
Location: Tampa, FL
Hi all,

I was just reading the Pozar book and on p.553 it mentions that "it is preferable to design for less than the maximum obtainable gain to improve bandwidth."

Is there a formal derivation to this statement? I'm curious why.



Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:25 am
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 65
Location: Singapore

I think it's related to this condition "Gain-Bandwidth is equal to constant", which derived from Bode-Fano Theorem.

Therefore, by designing for less than the maximum obtainable gain, wider bandwidth will be obtained.

Thanks and Regards,


Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Mon May 02, 2005 1:30 pm

The last post is absolutly correct. Fanos limit shows that for wider bandwidth, the gain will be reduced.


Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Tue May 03, 2005 8:49 am

Aint Bode-Fano's criterion showing the VSWR-bandwidth product that a matching network can have for a given quality factor mostly for passive devices shuch as antenas?

I always had the impession that remplacing VSWR by GAIN was an oversimplification. In my mind it only work as stated if the device in unilateral.

Second, what is this GAIN-Bandwitdh tradeoff? What gain? A flat gain or the Maximum available gain over frequency, whatever value or rolloff it shows?

Very often people will design matching network to autocompensate the gain rolloff and obtain a flat response, by sacrificing the VSWR.

I see Bode-Fano as a good starting point to sea if a matching is feasable.


Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Tue May 03, 2005 11:43 am

You are correct , it is a criterion for passive networks. The matching networks are passive, therfore, the wider the bandwidth the higher the loss, hence lower gain.

Posted  11/12/2012
RF Superstore (RF Components) - RF Cafe
EMC Directory
Amplifier Solutions Corporation (ASC) - RF Cafe

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low−priced products, all of which I created.

These Are Available for Free