RIGOL Technologies (test equipment) - RF Cafe
Windfreak Technologies
 

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster

Copyright: 1996 - 2024
Webmaster:
    Kirt Blattenberger,

    BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got Mail" when a new message arrived...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

AirplanesAndRockets.com

Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations RF Engineering Quizzes Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Engineering magazine articles Engineering software Engineering smorgasbord RF Cafe Archives RF Cascade Workbook 2018 RF Symbols for Visio - Word Advertising RF Cafe Homepage Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!
Anatech Electronics

Gap between Microstrip and Ground Plane - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2012 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. If the folks at phpBB would release a version with integrated sign-in from the major social media platforms, I would resurrect the RF Cafe Forums, but until then it is probably not worth the effort. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

ljoseph
Post subject: Gap between Microstrip and Ground Plane Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:03 am

Captain


Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 7:54 am
Posts: 13
Location: Dallas
Hello

I have microsrtip line on the PCB with following specifications:
Er = 4.25
H = 0.3mm
T = 32.5um
With this, width of 50 ohms line is 0.56mm.

On the PCB it is better to provide ground fill on both sides of Microstriop line so that fields radiating from the line will be terminated on the ground fill. But, depnding on the distance between the Mcirostrip line and Gnd plane, CPW effects will take over. What is the ideal distance between the Microstrip line and the ground fill so that CPW effects won't dominate and affect characteristics impedance of the line?


Top

IR
Post subject: Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:19 pm

Site Admin


Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Germany
Hello ljoseph,

From my experience, the best distance from both sides of the Microstrip line is 1.5 to double the line width.

Don't forget to stitch plated vias in a distance which is around 1/10 wavelngth along the GND fills.

Hope this helps.

Good luck!


Top

ljoseph
Post subject: Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 6:00 pm

Captain


Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 7:54 am
Posts: 13
Location: Dallas
Hello

Thanks for your reply.
Could you please explain the function of ground fill. Still, I am not very clear about it.


Top

Noise
Post subject: Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 2:06 am

Captain


Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 4:59 am
Posts: 15
hello,

In my opinion the distance from GND should be 4 time the copper width.
Else it will act like Coplanar and not as microstrip.
For Coplanar as far as ratio a\b is bigger , the characteristic impedance is bigger.
It can be seen as two parallel impednace (Coplanar and microstrip)



Noise


Top

IR
Post subject: Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 2:28 pm

Site Admin


Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Germany
The function of the GND planes is exactly as the shielding of a coaxial cable.


Top

madengr
Post subject: Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:55 pm

Captain


Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:22 pm
Posts: 5
Location: Overland Park, KS
I use a spacing of one or two substrate heights, depending on how long the trace is. Often people use N*trace_witdth, however lets say you have a low impedance line of Z0=10 ohms, would you still space at N*trace_width? EM simulators are inexpensive or free these days. Maybe try your configuration and see how much you can get away with.


http://www.sonnetusa.com/products/lite/









Posted  11/12/2012
KR Electronics (RF Filters) - RF Cafe
Werbel Microwave - RF Cafe
Amplifier Solutions Corporation (ASC) - RF Cafe
 

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low−priced products, all of which I created.

These Are Available for Free