Copyright: 1996 - 2024
BSEE - KB3UON
RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling
2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed
formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit
design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at
the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps
while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got
Mail" when a new message arrived...
All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images
and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.
My Hobby Website:
IP3 narrowband versus wideband- RF Cafe Forums
RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2012 mainly due to other social media
platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around
August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and
Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe
Forums activity dropped off precipitously. If the folks at
phpBB would release a version with integrated
sign-in from the major social media platforms, I would resurrect the RF Cafe Forums,
but until then it is probably not worth the effort. Regardless, there are still
lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at.
Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.
|-- Amateur Radio
Gripes & Humor
-- CAE, CAD, &
Test & Measurement
Post subject: IP3 narrowband versus wideband Posted: Fri
Oct 26, 2007 6:28 pm
Joined: Fri Oct 26,
2007 5:29 pm
I have measured the IP3 point of an amplifier
with a narrowband signal.
Is there a formula which takes into
account the bandwidth of the signal. Is it simply IP3 + 10 log (BWratio)?
Is there a reference which talks about this issue?
Post subject: Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:05 am
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
As far as I know there is no formula that
takes into consideration the BW of the signal.
the IEEE, the space between the 2 tones should be up to
the carrier or the middle frequency of operation.
Post subject: Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:20 pm
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 11:14 pm
The intercept point is defined as a combination of single tones,
so there really isn't a wideband equivalent. I've read several papers
about modeling wideband signals with multiple tones (Dr. Gard @ NC State
has some good papers on this), so people are looking at that. In this
case, you are looking at combinations of IP3/IP5/IP7, and spectral regrowth
is generally what's its referred as.
If you are looking at wideband
separation of tones (2 tones separated at several MHz), then the relative
phasing of the 2F1-F2 and 2F2-F1 terms can lead to asymmetry on the
high side and low side tones.