Search RFC: |                                     
Please support my efforts by ADVERTISING!
About | Sitemap | Homepage Archive
Serving a Pleasant Blend of Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow™
Vintage Magazines
Electronics World
Popular Electronics
Radio & TV News
QST | Pop Science
Popular Mechanics
Radio-Craft
Radio-Electronics
Short Wave Craft
Electronics | OFA
Saturday Eve Post
Please Support My Advertisers!
RF Cafe Sponsors
Aegis Power | Centric RF | RFCT
Alliance Test | Empower RF
Isotec | Reactel | SF Circuits

Formulas & Data

Electronics | RF
Mathematics
Mechanics | Physics


Calvin & Phineas

kmblatt83@aol.com

Resources

Articles, Forums, Radar
Magazines, Museum
Radio Service Data
Software, Videos


Artificial Intelligence

Entertainment

Crosswords, Humor Cogitations, Podcast
Quotes, Quizzes

Parts & Services

1000s of Listings

        Software:

Please Donate
RF Cascade Workbook | RF Symbols for Office
RF Symbols for Visio | RF Stencils for Visio
Espresso Engineering Workbook
Copper Mountain Technologies Vector Network Analyzers - RF Cafe

IP3 narrowband versus wideband- RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues - primarily having to spend time purging garbage posts from the board. At some point I might start the RF Cafe Forums again if the phpBB software gets better at filtering spam.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

radiorun
Post subject: IP3 narrowband versus wideband Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:28 pm

Lieutenant


Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:29 pm
Posts: 2
I have measured the IP3 point of an amplifier with a narrowband signal.

Is there a formula which takes into account the bandwidth of the signal. Is it simply IP3 + 10 log (BWratio)?

Is there a reference which talks about this issue?


Top

IR
Post subject: Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:05 am

Site Admin


Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Germany
As far as I know there is no formula that takes into consideration the BW of the signal.

According to the IEEE, the space between the 2 tones should be up to
+/-5% of the carrier or the middle frequency of operation.


Top

RFDave
Post subject: Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:20 pm

Captain


Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 11:14 pm
Posts: 10
The intercept point is defined as a combination of single tones, so there really isn't a wideband equivalent. I've read several papers about modeling wideband signals with multiple tones (Dr. Gard @ NC State has some good papers on this), so people are looking at that. In this case, you are looking at combinations of IP3/IP5/IP7, and spectral regrowth is generally what's its referred as.

If you are looking at wideband separation of tones (2 tones separated at several MHz), then the relative phasing of the 2F1-F2 and 2F2-F1 terms can lead to asymmetry on the high side and low side tones.

Dave




Posted  11/12/2012
Copper Mountain Technologies Vector Network Analyzers - RF Cafe
Modular Components - RF Cafe

Johanson Dielectrics EMI Filters - RF Cafe

Espresso Engineering Workbook