Windfreak Technologies
Berkeley Nucleonics Academy RF Boot Camp - RF Cafe
 

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster

Copyright: 1996 - 2024
Webmaster:
    Kirt Blattenberger,

    BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got Mail" when a new message arrived...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

AirplanesAndRockets.com

Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations RF Engineering Quizzes Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Engineering magazine articles Engineering software Engineering smorgasbord RF Cafe Archives RF Cascade Workbook 2018 RF Symbols for Visio - Word Advertising RF Cafe Homepage Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!
Anatech Electronics

Inquiry of noise figure - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2012 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. If the folks at phpBB would release a version with integrated sign-in from the major social media platforms, I would resurrect the RF Cafe Forums, but until then it is probably not worth the effort. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

James
Post subject: Inquiry of noise figure
Unread postPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:36 am

Dear Friends,

I am trying to improve the noise figure my system.

There is like this.

a) Current BPF component : 5.15 ~ 5.825GHz (700MHz Bandwidth)
b) Will be changed BPF component : 5.725 ~ 5.825GHz (100MHz Bandwidth)

If I changed the a) to b), noise figure will be improved up to 5dB. Is that right? Assuming same input signal comes.

I appreciate any help or comment or feedback,

Many thanks

:roll:


Top


Kirt Blattenberger
Post subject: Here's a start
Unread postPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:38 pm
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 2:02 pm
Posts: 308
Location: Erie, PA
Greetings James:

Changing the filter bandwidth will not affect the noise figure calculation, only the insertion loss (gain) of the filter will. However, reducing the bandwidth by a factor of 7 as you propose will reduce the noise power by 10*log(7)=8.45 dB. That in turn will improve your signal-to-noise ratio by 8.45 dB, since the noise power is dependent on the system bandwidth. So, the minimum detectable signal will be 8.45 dB lower. That translates to a range increase factor of 10^(8.45/20)=2.65.

These calculations hold for ideal environment and assume no other factors in the system equation change. It also assumes that the relative bandwidth changes are the noise power bandwidths of the filters and not just the 3 dB bandwidths, and that the final bandwidth at the detector is set by your new filter. At 100 MHz, it likely is not.

The benefit you will most likely realize is a reduction in the out-of-channel interference both from direct signals and from intermodulation products created by those out-of-band signals that end up in-band.

For all the formulas you need to do the calculations yourself, please go to this page and click on the links of interest.
https://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical.htm

On this page is a simple online cascade calculator:
https://www.rfcafe.com/references/spread ... alc-ss.htm

Also, you can download RF Workbench (shareware by RF Cafe) that includes calculations for determining filter noise bandwidth:
https://www.rfcafe.com/business/software ... kbench.htm


- Kirt Blattenberger :smt024


Top
Profile

Guest
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 8:01 pm

Dear Kirt:
Thank for your careful answer regarding my question.
Let me confirm a few things as follows:

1. I think the sensitvity will be 8.45dB better if I change 5.15 ~ 5.825GHz (700MHz Bandwidth) to 5.725 ~ 5.825GHz (100MHz Bandwidth). Is that right? Is sensitivy related with system bandwidth?

2. Based upon your reply, could you explain more details regarding range increase means? Does it cover more distance?

So, the minimum detectable signal will be 8.45 dB lower. That translates to a range increase factor of 10^(8.45/20)=2.65.


Best Regards,
James


Top


Kirt Blattenberger
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 9:43 pm
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 2:02 pm
Posts: 308
Location: Erie, PA
Greetings James:

1. Your sensitivity will be improved if the changed BW represents the final BW that your detector or smapling system will see. That is, if somewhere down the receive chain, there is, say, a 50 kHz bandwith filter prior to detection, then having reduced the other filter from 700 MHz down to 100 MHz will have no measureable effect. As mentioned, the benefit you might experience would be a reduction of interfering signals that get translated inband. That still counts as a signal-to-noise improvement, but in a different way.

2. Signal strength in power falls off at a rate of 20 log(2) dB, which is approximately 6.02 dB for every doubling of the distance. So, every 6.02 dB of improved sensitivity theoretically results in being able to receive a signal twice as far away. I say theoretically because in the real world, multipath and fading due to barriers can make the change something other than 6.02 dB.


- Kirt Blattenberger :smt024





Posted  11/12/2012
high frequency PCB of PCBONLINE
PCB Directory (Manufacturers)
Amplifier Solutions Corporation (ASC) - RF Cafe
 

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low−priced products, all of which I created.

These Are Available for Free