Anatech Electronics (RF Filters) - RF Cafe
LadyBug Technologies LB480A RF Power Sensor Connectors - RF Cafe
 

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster

Copyright: 1996 - 2024
Webmaster:
    Kirt Blattenberger,

    BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got Mail" when a new message arrived...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

AirplanesAndRockets.com

Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations RF Engineering Quizzes Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Engineering magazine articles Engineering software Engineering smorgasbord RF Cafe Archives RF Cascade Workbook 2018 RF Symbols for Visio - Word Advertising RF Cafe Homepage Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!
Innovative Power Products Couplers

Receiver Antenna in SPICE - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2012 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. If the folks at phpBB would release a version with integrated sign-in from the major social media platforms, I would resurrect the RF Cafe Forums, but until then it is probably not worth the effort. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

jdirga
Post subject: Receiver Antenna in SPICE Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:13 pm

Captain

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:58 pm
Posts: 5
I need to include a receiver antenna in SPICE simulation. Should I model it as a current source or voltage source? Does this depend on the type of antenna (whether it's a dipole, loop, etc) that I use? Please help. Thx.


Top

RDO-RF
Post subject: Re: Receiver Antenna in SPICEPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:19 pm

Captain


Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 7:53 am
Posts: 12
I think you can manage to use any of those sources as long as it has the correct internal characteristic impedance of your system.

_________________
web: http://www.rdo-labs.com

Top

IR
Post subject: Re: Receiver Antenna in SPICEPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:40 pm

Site Admin


Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Germany
Antenna should be simulated as voltage source. The type of antenna does not matter for the SPICE simulation.

_________________
Best regards,

- IR


Top

jdirga
Post subject: Re: Receiver Antenna in SPICEPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:11 pm

Captain

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:58 pm
Posts: 5
Thanks for all the replies. Could you give a reason why it should be modeled as a voltage source instead of a current source?

My original thought was if it were a loop antenna, it should be modeled as a voltage source because the signal is generated on the received antenna thru Faraday's law of induction, i.e. emf=change of flux. However if it were a dipole, it should be modeled as a current source because signal is generated due to lenz's law?(I'm not confident with this).


Top

IR
Post subject: Re: Receiver Antenna in SPICEPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 4:05 pm

Site Admin


Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Germany
Why a voltage source? good question.

1. In all of the RF text books I have encountered Antenna is modeld as voltage source, transmitter is modeled as voltage source with Thevenin resistnce etc (On the other hand it also could have been modeled as a current source...). So it is a matter of industry convntion, also the case for: VSWR, S-parameters etc.

2. If you want to add a noise source to the simulation (Which is very common in simulatin an Antenna circuit) you will also have to model it through a voltage source and its associated noise resistance - Johnson noise model. In this case it is easier to combine the signal voltage with the noise voltage rather than a current signal with noise voltage.

_________________
Best regards,

- IR


Top

jdirga
Post subject: Re: Receiver Antenna in SPICEPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:35 am

Captain

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:58 pm
Posts: 5
I am hoping to know the physical reason why normally reception antenna is modeled as a voltage source.
Whether it's a voltage source or current sources matters in my simulation, for example, in transient simulation, if voltage source is used, when the voltage source reaches, let's say, 1mV and the capacitive load is already charged up to 1mV, current will no longer flow because there's no voltage difference. However, when current source is used, current will flow to the capacitive load no matter what.








Posted  11/12/2012
Werbel Microwave - RF Cafe
Axiom Test Equipment - RF Cafe
 

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low−priced products, all of which I created.

These Are Available for Free