Search RFC: |                                     
Please support my efforts by ADVERTISING!
About | Sitemap | Homepage Archive
Serving a Pleasant Blend of Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow™
Vintage Magazines
Electronics World
Popular Electronics
Radio & TV News
QST | Pop Science
Popular Mechanics
Radio-Craft
Radio-Electronics
Short Wave Craft
Electronics | OFA
Saturday Eve Post
Please Support My Advertisers!
RF Cafe Sponsors
Aegis Power | Centric RF | RFCT
Alliance Test | Empower RF
Isotec | Reactel | SF Circuits

Formulas & Data

Electronics | RF
Mathematics
Mechanics | Physics


Calvin & Phineas

kmblatt83@aol.com

Resources

Articles, Forums, Radar
Magazines, Museum
Radio Service Data
Software, Videos


Artificial Intelligence

Entertainment

Crosswords, Humor Cogitations, Podcast
Quotes, Quizzes

Parts & Services

1000s of Listings

        Software:

Please Donate
RF Cascade Workbook | RF Symbols for Office
RF Symbols for Visio | RF Stencils for Visio
Espresso Engineering Workbook
Windfreak Technologies SynthHD PRO - RF Cafe

Some distributed systems questions ... - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues - primarily having to spend time purging garbage posts from the board. At some point I might start the RF Cafe Forums again if the phpBB software gets better at filtering spam.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

taz
Post subject: Some distributed systems questions ...
Unread postPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 12:12 pm
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 2
hi,

I have two basic but important questions, I hope you can help me:

1. Why do we use distributed model (and not lumped) in frequency applications\problems ??? what are the advantages\disadvantages ?
2. Why there are incident waves and reflected waves in a transition line ? this happen for both sinusoidal and step function….why ???

Thanks,
taz


Top
Profile

Itay
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 12:36 pm

Greetings,

No clue for your first question. If you will be more specific I might give you an answer. Basically, distributed elements can be modeled as lumped elements for the the purpose of analysis; for example, this is the way to derive the telegraphic equations of a transmission line.

For your second question: Incident waves are voltage waves that flows from a source eg: Generator to a load. In an ideal circuit all the energy of these waves is being absorbed in the load. In the practical world, a portion of this energy is reflected back due to impedance mismatch. The impedance of the load should be equal to the characteristic impedance of the system eg Zo, which is usually 50 ohm in RF systems, 75 ohm in Video applications and 600 ohm in Audio applications. The amout of the mismatch determines the size of the reflected waves. The reflection coefficient determines the size of the reflections. It is defined as: rho=(ZL-Z0)/(ZL+Z0). From here you can also derive the return loss, which is the amount of the reflected wave in relation to the incident wave: RL=-20 log |rho|. That means how lower is the reflected wave comparing to the incident one (It should be as low as possible of course)

Hope this helps,
Itay


Top


taz
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 1:02 pm
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 2
Hi Itay, thanks for your answer !

I will start with your second answer, I agree with what you said 100%, and for the present time I accept it as an axiom. This is why I'm asking these questions …why mismatch is causing reflected waves ? why In the practical world, a portion of this energy is reflected back ??? why match circuits don’t have reflected waves ???
I understand the math, but I don't understand the physics behind it ….

And for my first question, for my best understanding …these are two different theories , but according to what you said – they are derived from another . is that a correct interpretation ???

by the way, why in speakers wiring there's no indication for impedance ??


again…thanks,
taz


Top
Profile

Itay
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 1:42 pm

Greetings Taz,

You are welcome.

Yes the theory of transmission lines is derived from an analysis of lumped model which defines the transmission line as LPF circuit that includes L,G,R,C elements and also their values per unit length. From this theory you also derive the Zo and Gamma coeffiencient: Zo= sqrt (L/C) - In loseless tranmission lines and Zo= sqrt ((R+jwL)/(G+JwC)) in lossy transmission lines and many more definitions...

I advise you to read more in text books regarding your questions and find better answers. Posting questions like these in a forum won't bring the answers you would expect, as there are many lines to write about it and people aren't that patient to write them...

Regarding your question about speakers, please read the following:

http://www.duncanamps.com/technical/dummyload.html

Speakers have a varying load impedance and there is no meaning for the impedance of the wiring.

I hope this helps,

Itay




Posted  11/12/2012
Windfreak Technologies SynthHD PRO - RF Cafe