Triad RF Systems
LadyBug Technologies LB479A RF Power Sensor - RF Cafe

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster

Copyright: 1996 - 2024
    Kirt Blattenberger,


RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got Mail" when a new message arrived...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations RF Engineering Quizzes Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Engineering magazine articles Engineering software Engineering smorgasbord RF Cafe Archives RF Cascade Workbook 2018 RF Symbols for Visio - Word Advertising RF Cafe Homepage Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!
Anatech Electronics

Titanium Enclosure Question - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2012 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. If the folks at phpBB would release a version with integrated sign-in from the major social media platforms, I would resurrect the RF Cafe Forums, but until then it is probably not worth the effort. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

 Post subject: Titanium Enclosure Question
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:19 am 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:37 am
Posts: 1
Hi, Industrial Designer with little RF knowledge in need of help here...

I need to design a Titanium enclosure for a device that receives GPRS Data, meaning, the signal should not be weakened by the enclosure (much). The antenna would be inside, protected by the Titanium cover, much like in a celphone.

Knowing that Titanium is not (slightly?) magnetic, would a signal in the 850-1900 Mhz Range travel through a thin sheet (ie 0.5mm) of pure Titanium?

I have read elsewhere about "RF permeable" or "RF transparent" but it sounds too good to be true.

As an alternative, would perforation help (i.e. hole pattern) on the aeras covering the actual antennas?

I've been having trouble to figure out any specs on this, the only leads I found where about coatings of antennae and such....

Thanks for your advice to a layperson,it would be highly appreciated!



 Post subject: Re: Titanium Enclosure Question
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:54 pm 

Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 3:51 pm
Posts: 104
A six-sided box made of 0.5mm titanium (or indeed any metal) will be an excellent Faraday cage - almost no RF signal of any frequency will make it through. Cellphones are mostly not metal (injection-molded plastic, perhaps coated with a conductive material in areas which are intended to be shielded) - and in any case, the antenna is outside the shielded part of the cellphone.

The recent debacle with the Apple iPhone was due to their clever solution to this problem - they placed the antenna on the outer rim, where it could be contacted by the user's hand, and if held so that the hand bridged one of the gaps, signal dropped. Still, it was in some ways a good solution to the dilemma of not enclosing your antenna with a shield, when you box your product.

Antenna design for portable electronics is often a very difficult field.

The antenna must be outside the metallic enclosure, somehow. If you cut a window in the metallic box, of the right size, you will get some signal - but the antenna and box combination will almost certainly be very directional. "Directional" means "almost deaf in some directions".

How do I know that you can't put the antenna inside? The "skin depth" is how far an electromagnetic field ("radio wave") can penetrate into a conductor (like metal). The formula is d=sqrt(f*pi*mu*sigma), where f is the frequency in Hertz, mu is the magnetic permeability of the material, and sigma is the conductivity of the material. I don't have the numbers for titanium at my fingertips, but for copper at 900 MHz the depth is 2.2 microns. If the wave can't make it through the metal, it doesn't reach the inside.

So what can you do? "Slot antennas" are a possibility, as is the Apple iPhone idea.

Good Luck!

 Post subject: Re: Titanium Enclosure Question
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 pm 

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 4:14 am
Posts: 1
I believe that a Titanium enclosure is compatible with an iphone. The issues cover a lot of speculations and they made alternative solution for the problem. I insist it can be a good Apple iphone idea.

toll free numbers

Posted  11/12/2012
withwave microwave devices - RF Cafe
LOTUS Communications Systems Modular RF Component Building Blocks - RF Cafe

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low−priced products, all of which I created.

These Are Available for Free