Copyright: 1996 - 2024
BSEE - KB3UON
RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling
2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed
formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit
design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at
the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps
while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got
Mail" when a new message arrived...
All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images
and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.
My Hobby Website:
Whats best for amplifier efficiency... Large V or small V ? - RF
RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2012 mainly due to other social media
platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around
August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and
Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe
Forums activity dropped off precipitously. If the folks at
phpBB would release a version with integrated
sign-in from the major social media platforms, I would resurrect the RF Cafe Forums,
but until then it is probably not worth the effort. Regardless, there are still
lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at.
Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.
|-- Amateur Radio
Gripes & Humor
-- CAE, CAD, &
Test & Measurement
Post subject: Whats best for amplifier efficiency... Large
V or small V ?
Unread postPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 11:42 am
If I run an amplifier with a large DC supply rail (lets say 12 Volts)
as opposed to a small supply rail (lets say 3 Volts) then for the same
RF power output the currents flowing around are going to very much smaller
in my 12Volt system than if I had operated with the 3 volt rail. With
this in mind I then think (maybe incorrectly) that the losses in my
high voltage system must be much lower than the 3 volt system (I am
assuming I squared R loss dominates). I am not sure if the assumption
that I squared R loss is the dominant mechanism generally but I would
imagine that it is for most HF,VHF and UHF to say 1GHz amplifiers ?
Now if this is all sound thinking........why are we seeing lots more
lower voltage transistors and less and less of the higher voltage ones?
Of course there is the argument of where you get a large supply
rail from if limited to small voltage batteries or a low supply rail
but then you can always add a switch mode step up converter!
Anyone care to comment on all this?
Unread postPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 12:46 pm
From what I understood you are dealing with
a low power amplifier eg MMIC or Transistor. Amplifier efficiency can
be calculated by the ratio: Pac/Pdc. The amplifier has to draw a constant
current which is the bias current. You can set this current by a voltage
drop resistor, which can be calculated by: R=(Vrail-Vd)/Ibias, where
Vd is the device voltage. If you use a high rail voltage then the overall
circuit effiency is degraded due to the power dissipated on the resistor,
however the efficiency of the amplifier will remain the same. if you
draw more output power from the amplifier then you will increase the
I hope this helps,
Unread postPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2004
Thats all fine but I am thinking more in terms of class
B or C. In these cases you dont have a bias resistor in the emitter!
Since my last post the only other thing I can think that would be a
reason to run a lower supply voltage is the benefit to impedance matching.
From the basic theory for class C amplfiers with a collector choke the
required impedance at the transistor collector is approximately VCC^2/(2xPload)
So from this equation you can adjust VCC to get your required impedance
as near as possible to 50 ohms (assuming a 50 ohm system). You then
do not need to impedance match (apart from a bit of reactive cancellation).
Apart from the above argument I still do not see why we are seeing
so many low voltage transistors around!