Windfreak Technologies
Exodus Advanced Communications Best in Class RF Amplifier SSPAs
 

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster

Copyright: 1996 - 2024
Webmaster:
    Kirt Blattenberger,

    BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got Mail" when a new message arrived...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

AirplanesAndRockets.com

Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations RF Engineering Quizzes Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Engineering magazine articles Engineering software Engineering smorgasbord RF Cafe Archives RF Cascade Workbook 2018 RF Symbols for Visio - Word Advertising RF Cafe Homepage Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!
everythingRF RF & Microwave Parts Database (h1) - RF Cafe

breakdown voltage and biasing?? - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2012 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. If the folks at phpBB would release a version with integrated sign-in from the major social media platforms, I would resurrect the RF Cafe Forums, but until then it is probably not worth the effort. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

VeryConfused
Post subject: breakdown voltage and biasing?? Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:36 am
like kris i am also designing a PA but it much simpler and is single ended all the way! my thing is a on-chip PA not on a PCB. i have to worry about high voltage swing because it is a PA and transistor breaking down. in bjt the design manual of the technology i am using says that breakdown voltage of collector-emitter (BVCEO) is 4 volts although the process is 5 V process (5V power supply). i thought BVCEO is always greater than the supply voltage but here it is not the case, any idea way?

HERE IS THE MAIN QUESTION: if the VCE breakdown is 3.5 voltage does it mean that i CANNOT bias the transistor across collector-emitter higher than 3.5 V? like ac swing can go higher than BVCEO 'n i understand that but as far as DC biasing is concerned i'm very confused...if i bias at VCE = 3.5 V than the ac swing will be only 2*3.5 = 7 V instead of what i though should be (2*VCC = 2*5 = 10 V)....respond pleeeease!!


Top

Guest
Post subject: VCEPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:21 am
It's worse than you feared.

BVCEO is the maximum allowable Voltage from the Collector to the Emitter, with the base Open - which is not normally how you use the device.

A "5 Volt" process is one which can withstand power supply voltages of 5 Volts - not all of that can necessarily appear from the collector to the emitter, as you have discovered with your "3.5 Volt VCE" rating.

So your absolute maximum swing at the collector is from 0 to 3.5 V, That's only 3.5 V peak-to-peak, not 7 V,

You'll need to work at a lower impedance level than you thought - more current, less voltage. Impedance matching will be a necessary part of such a design. If lowering the impedance can't be done then you'll need to pick a different process.

Sorry.

Good Luck anyway!


Top

VeryConfused
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 4:30 pm
so you are saying i can't bias at 3.5 VCE?? i will have to bias it as like 1.5 V? thanks for your help!!


Top

Guest
Post subject: VCE etcPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:49 am
Yes. You should not ever have a voltage that exceeds 3.5 V between the collector and the emitter, if that's what the VCE(max) rating of the transistor is. For class A operation, that implies a DC bias point near 1.5 Volts.

What happens if you exceed 3.5V from collector to emitter?

If you exceed it too much, you get instantaneous failure (we've all done it!) However, if you exceed it by a little, you're gambling on process statistics and long-term reliability.

Good Luck!


Top

VeryConfused
Post subject: Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:56 pm
hi...thanks a lot. but let me clarify something. i have couple of books that cover PAs and in all of them they show that the output voltage waveform (vc or vce waveform) is centered around VCC (because of the RFC inductor at the collector, i think) which would mean that they are biasing the transistor at the supply voltage!!! doesn't make sense to me...maybe they are assuming that their VCE breakdown is higher than the supply voltage, could that be the case?

but if the above is true and i also use a RFC then my 5V supply will go across collector-emitter and since my BVCEO is only 3.5, this means breakdown. do i not use RFC?? please clarify if possible...thanks


Top

Tony Kurlovich
Post subject: Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:44 pm
BVceo is a very conservative number because as guest says it is not how you normally use the device.

BVces is the maximum allowable Voltage from the Collector to the Emitter, with the base Shorted. BVces is usually much larger than BVceo and approaching that limit requires sinking all consequent base current to the emitter.

What you can get away with is between those two numbers. Also, pushing these limits can cost you some noise floor because break down is very zener like.

The news gets much worse for a PA when VSWR is taken in to account. If you are pushing the limits with a well matched Class A, there is a mistermination phase that will likely push the peak to peak voltage towards twice its terminated value.

Use the RFC but not the 5V process.



Posted  11/12/2012
TotalTemp Technologies (Thermal Platforms) - RF Cafe
ConductRF Phased Matched RF Cables - RF Cafe
Axiom Test Equipment - RF Cafe
 

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low−priced products, all of which I created.

These Are Available for Free