Search RFC: |                                     
Please support my efforts by ADVERTISING!
About | Sitemap | Homepage Archive
Serving a Pleasant Blend of Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow™
Vintage Magazines
Electronics World
Popular Electronics
Radio & TV News
QST | Pop Science
Popular Mechanics
Radio-Craft
Radio-Electronics
Short Wave Craft
Electronics | OFA
Saturday Eve Post
Please Support My Advertisers!
RF Cafe Sponsors
Aegis Power | Centric RF | RFCT
Alliance Test | Empower RF
Isotec | Reactel | SF Circuits

Formulas & Data

Electronics | RF
Mathematics
Mechanics | Physics


Calvin & Phineas

kmblatt83@aol.com

Resources

Articles, Forums, Radar
Magazines, Museum
Radio Service Data
Software, Videos


Artificial Intelligence

Entertainment

Crosswords, Humor Cogitations, Podcast
Quotes, Quizzes

Parts & Services

1000s of Listings

        Software:

Please Donate
RF Cascade Workbook | RF Symbols for Office
RF Symbols for Visio | RF Stencils for Visio
Espresso Engineering Workbook
Windfreak Technologies Frequency Synthesizers - RF Cafe

slope of IIP3 graph - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues - primarily having to spend time purging garbage posts from the board. At some point I might start the RF Cafe Forums again if the phpBB software gets better at filtering spam.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

Guest
Post subject: slope of IIP3 graph Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:59 am
hi to all,
i am getting a strange resu;t, let me desicribe that first.
When I am plotting I and III harmonics of a Common Source Amplifier (for IIP3 ) , I am getting slope of '3' of III harmonic curve , but when I cascade it with another Common Source Amplifeir , I get slope of less then '3' !!!

Isn't it strange ???

Please help me . . . . .

I have second doubt that if it is correct that slope will decrease then everyone must use cascading as it increases IIP3 point !


Please help,
please . .. . . .. . .. . .


Top

Guest
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:38 pm
your probablycompressing the second amplifier.. Back off on the input power.


Top

Guest
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:52 pm
really could not understand first reply
sorry


Top

IR
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 3:15 pm

Site Admin


Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Germany
Hello Guest,

IP3 is measured under 'small signal' conditions.

To be more specific according to the IEEE: the IMR3 (3rd order Intermodulation Ratio), which is the difference between the 1st order signal to the 3rd order (in dB) should be greater than 20dBc.

For each 1dB increment in the fundamental signal (1st order) the IM3 product is increased in 3dB.

When you cascade 2 amplifiers and you want to measure the cascaded IP3, you should check that both amplifiers are working in small signal region and far enough from P1dB. If the slope is no more 3:1, that means that one of the amplifiers is working in non-linear region i.e. close to compression. The meaning of backing off is to reduce the input power to the amplifier and by that to decrease the output power and backing it off from compression. Try to reduce the input power to the first amplifier and measure the IP3 again.

Good luck!

_________________
Best regards,

- IR


Top

Guest
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:47 am
really very very impressed by IR's answer.
Thanks a lot ,
--amit




Posted  11/12/2012
Windfreak Technologies Frequency Synthesizers - RF Cafe
Modular Components - RF Cafe



Innovative Power Products (IPP) 90 deg Hybrid Couplers - RF Cafe