RIGOL Technologies (test equipment) - RF Cafe
Windfreak Technologies
 

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster

Copyright: 1996 - 2024
Webmaster:
    Kirt Blattenberger,

    BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got Mail" when a new message arrived...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

AirplanesAndRockets.com

Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations RF Engineering Quizzes Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Engineering magazine articles Engineering software Engineering smorgasbord RF Cafe Archives RF Cascade Workbook 2018 RF Symbols for Visio - Word Advertising RF Cafe Homepage Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!
everythingRF RF & Microwave Parts Database (h2) - RF Cafe

Challenges facing microwave filter engineers - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in 2012 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2010, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. If the folks at phpBB would release a version with integrated sign-in from the major social media platforms, I would resurrect the RF Cafe Forums, but until then it is probably not worth the effort. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

guest
Post subject: transient freq. vs. ic and transistor sizing Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 12:51 pm
hello...i am designing a RF amplifier for a certain gain. the transistor i am using provides the usual plot for ft vs. Ic for a certain dimension...but i need to operate at a Ic value which is higher than the Ic that gives max. ft....how do i insure that i can use the Ic i want and still have that Ic correspond to max. ft....obviously i increased the transistor size but that would drop my ft at the Ic i want.

the related question how can i find out where the max. ft is for my modified transistor size...is there any way of plotting ft. vs. ic by yourself using cadence/ads, etc or in other words given a certain transistor size and Ic value how can i figure out what the ft is for size/Ic combination...thanx much

--rs


Top

Guest
Post subject: FtPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:35 pm
The issue isn't what the transition frequency ft is - that's the frequency where your transistor becomes as useless as a lump of coal. The issue is what gain (hfe or beta) you have at the operating frequency. People often use the "rule of thumb" that the amplifier should run at no more than ft/10, but that's not always possible. I encourage you to look beyond ft.

You're obviously designing an IC - the ordinary designer, with discrete devices, has no control over the geometry. Unfortunately, the ft versus ic curve is characteristic of the process and layout specifics of the transistor - so you don't really have much flexibility here.

This is really an issue you should take up with your vendor's support staff. If they can't help you, you might want to re-consider working with them, as they would be either uninterested in your order (a bad sign), or incapable of intelligently analyzing their product (also a bad sign).

Good Luck!


Top

guest
Post subject: Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:00 pm
hello...but isn't there a way to estimate what my ft is using some sort of analysis?? let's say i have fixed a size and Ic...now just want to know what my ft would be....i remember something about you can do ac analysis and then something but i don't recall it


Top

rficdude
Post subject: Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 11:14 pm

Lieutenant

Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 9:19 am
Posts: 4
Making the transistor bigger does not necessarily cause the peak ft versus Ic to drop in frequency.

What ever you do, DO NOT bias the transistor beyond the peak ft Ic because ft drops rapidly after the peak and the ft will vary a lot part to part for the same bias current.

You can always test ft in simulation by running parametric simulations sweeping both the frequency and the base input current. Then you need a function that finds the peak ft frequency for each value of collector current. Then you can plot peak ft versus current density or just current if you like.

_________________
RFICDUDE




Posted  11/12/2012
high frequency PCB of PCBONLINE
ConductRF Phased Matched RF Cables - RF Cafe
 

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low−priced products, all of which I created.

These Are Available for Free