RF Cascade Workbook for Excel
RF & Electronics Symbols for Visio
RF & Electronics Symbols for Office
RF & Electronics Stencils for Visio
RF Workbench
T-Shirts, Mugs, Cups, Ball Caps, Mouse Pads
Espresso Engineering Workbook™
Smith Chart™ for Excel
|
|
PMR field measurements - RF Cafe Forums
|
Gavin
|
Post subject: PMR field measurements
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:20 pm
|
|
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008
8:46 pm Posts: 6 |
Hi,
I have a 1/4 wave unity gain roof mounted
whip antenna (66-175MHz band) which connects to
a unit which takes RF field strength measurements
along with GPS readings.
I would like to
take measurements in the 80MHz and 160MHz bands
and I was wondering if I need to cut the antenna
to the appropriate 1/4 wavelength using the relationship
lamda = c/f
where c is the speed of light
f is the operating frequency lamda is the wavelength
of the frequency f
If I just leave the antenna
at the default 1.3 metre length what affect will
it have on the field strength readings at the different
bands?
My test equipment takes measurements
in dBm, do I need to include an antenna calibration
(K or antenna) factor for the measurements calculated
using the equation?
K = L – G + 20log(f)
– 32
Where
K is the antenna/K factor
(dB) L is the combined cable and connector loss
(dB) G is the antenna gain (dBd) F is the
frequency (MHz)
Any help is appreciated,
I'm a bit new to the RF end of the transceiver chain.
Regards,
Gavin
|
|
|
|
|
nubbage |
Post subject: Re: PMR field measurements
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:51 pm
|
|
|
General |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006
12:07 pm Posts: 268 Location: London UK
|
Hi Gavin The antenna you mention is too narrow
in bandwidth to measure the field strength accurately
and use correction formulas across such a wide band:
the error in correction factors would be too high.
You either need to cut several vertical monopoles
using the formula you quote for wavelength, with
a correction factor of say 0.94 to allow for detuning
capacitive effects to ground, or buy/construct a
broadband antenna. There are some verticals advertised
in the amateur press that cover 40 to 1300MHz in
one antenna, and they are not expemsive. Professional
ones are far more expensive. Two important factors
come into the calculation: 1 the effect of feed
line mismatch reflecting some of the signal back
into space instead of to the receiver, which needs
an accurate impedance plot in order to do a correction.
Thus the less variation there is across the band
the easier is the correction. 2 gain variation
due to changing "aperture" size, which is fairly
easy to compensate for. Take a look around the
market for a broadband 50 ohm unbalanced (ie coax
feed) antenna that covers the band you want, or
if you want to experiment, then built your own.
_________________ At bottom, life is all
about Sucking in and blowing out.
|
|
|
|
|
Gavin |
Post subject: Re: PMR field measurements
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:30 pm
|
|
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008
8:46 pm Posts: 6 |
Hi Nubbage,
Thanks for your reply, I think
I wasn't clear in my initial post, I am not trying
to take measurements across the whole band from
80 to 160 MHz but to take 2 sets of measurements,
one in each band. The channel width of both bands
is 12.5kHz.
With this in my mind, do I need
to address any of the issues raised in my initial
post?
Regards,
Gavin
|
|
|
|
|
nubbage |
Post subject: Re: PMR field measurements
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:10 am
|
|
|
General |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006
12:07 pm Posts: 268 Location: London UK
|
Hi Gavin No, I understood your point. My suggestion
to find a single antenna that covers the 2 bands
of interest is then a) you do not have to change
antennas as you do the drive test and b) the
supplier will give you an antenna calibration factor
for the antenna A low-cost solution would be
to cut quarter-wave verticals for each of the bands
using that formula for wavelength, adjusted short
by 5%. Confirming the true gain is then not so straight-forward,
however. I have never used/needed the formula
you quote. When calibrating I use a measurement
point near to (a known distance) within line of
site of my base station, and compute what the signal
level should be from the transmit output power,
feeder loss, and Tx antenna gain, Rx antenna gain
and any feeder loss. I have also calibrated the
receiver from a recently calibrated signal generator,
giving an accurately known output power in dBm.
The computed and measured signal levels will be
slightly different due to second order effects like
feeder impedance mis-match loss etc. Typically this
difference is 1 or 2dB, which for a bog standard
drive test is usually good enough. Then away I go
letting the 2 channel logger (GPS and signal level)
chug away.
_________________ At bottom, life is all
about Sucking in and blowing out.
|
|
|
|
|
Gavin |
Post subject: Re: PMR field measurements
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:51 am
|
|
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008
8:46 pm Posts: 6 |
Thanks for the clarification, will be taking measurements
this weekend.
|
|
Posted 11/12/2012
|
|
|
|