RF Cascade Workbook for Excel
RF & Electronics Symbols for Visio
RF & Electronics Symbols for Office
RF & Electronics Stencils for Visio
RF Workbench
T-Shirts, Mugs, Cups, Ball Caps, Mouse Pads
Espresso Engineering Workbook™
Smith Chart™ for Excel
|
|
VSWR measurment with a Spectrum Analyzer - RF Cafe Forums
|
CyberOli
|
Post subject: VSWR measurment with a Spectrum Analyzer
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:27 am
|
|
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007
8:09 am Posts: 12 Location: Belgium
|
Hello everybody, i am new on this forum
.
Say, i would like to measure the VSWR in
a cable connected to an end-device. I would like
to do that because we got some troubles with the
front feeding device just before the cable (we can
assume that's RF generator). This device goes quite
often down and i think it's because of a mismatch
between the impedances and therefore a part of the
energy sent through the cable comes back and damage
little by little the feeding device. The
thing is that i have only a spectrum analyzer to
do this measurment, i know there is a way to do
the measurment with this device and a coupler (or
RF bridge). My problem is that i don't know how
excatly we do that and how a coupler work. Can someone
help me or forward me towards an internet page or
a good pdf document which describes what i have
to do and how it works. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
sm7ovk |
Post subject:
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 2:47 pm
|
|
|
Captain |
|
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007
12:59 pm Posts: 16 |
Hi, to do any SWR-measurement you must have some
sort of generator and a coupler. It's then this
reflected power you measure and calculate the SWR.
A spectrum analyzer alone is just not enough. Together
with a coupler you could use the analyzer as power
meter but you must also have access to a point before
the unit you have problems with.
Regards
Jens
|
|
|
|
|
CyberOli |
Post subject:
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:48 am
|
|
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007
8:09 am Posts: 12 Location: Belgium
|
Thank you for your answer, but what do you mean
by "having an access before the unit i have problems
with"?
You mean to mesure the power that
this unit will receive in order to be able to calculate
the return loss of the assembly? But i can measure
the feedback energy and then the energy which is
provided to the device in two times no?
What
i am afraid of is that if i let an output of the
coupler "open" (a directionnal couple has 4 connectors,
one for the generator, one for the device, one for
the spectrum analyzer, but in that case the last
will remain unconnected ) without any device connected
to it, will it have any impact on the measure and
so the results i can have?
|
|
|
|
|
nubbage |
Post subject:
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:45 am
|
|
|
General |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006
12:07 pm Posts: 268 Location: London UK
|
You are right. You must leave the unconnected port
of a 4 port coupler correctly terminated in a matched
load. An alternative that is accurate enough
in most cases is to connect the analyser probe not
directly to the coupler ports (forward or reverse)
but through a 6dB or even a 10dB attenuator attached
to each coupled arm. This ensures that the ports
are always matched, but allows a quick change from
forward to reverse for the analyser connection.
Of course, this method only gives the scalar
reflection coefficient, not the vector value.
|
|
|
|
|
CyberOli |
Post subject:
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 10:19 am
|
|
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007
8:09 am Posts: 12 Location: Belgium
|
Sorry can you be more precise on your last remark?
i dont see what you mean by vector value of the
reflection coefficient
The postion of the max and the min along the standing
wave?
|
|
|
|
|
RFTEJerry |
Post subject:
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:45 am
|
|
|
Captain |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006
9:53 am Posts: 17 Location: Florida
|
Hello CyerOli,
First, what is the VSWR (RL)
value you want to measure? This method may not have
enough accuracy.
To measure VSWR with a spectrum
analyzer and a coupler do the following:
For a three port coupler: Terminate the coupler's
"input" port in a "perfect" 50 ohm load. Since one
does not really exist use one with a VSWR of 1.05:1
will do. The RL is -32 dB. Connect your source
output to the coupler's "output" port. Connect
the coupled port to the spectrum analyzer input.
Setup the spec-ana to cover the frequency of interest
and a reference level 10 dB above the expected RL.
(Zero span will work also). Setup your source
for the frequency(s) of interest and a power level
of 0 dBm. The coupler should have a diagram indicating
the normal thru path so just reverse it - the output
is the input.
Measure the reflected power
on the spectrum analyzer. Add the coupling factor
and then convert the RL to VSWR using the standard
formular. Use the standard formulars to calculate
mismatch uncertanity and you have your answer
There are a couple of error to watch out for.
First the directivity of the coupler has to be at
least 15 dB better that the RL to be measured. If
not then the results will have serious uncertanity.
For example, if the RL to be measured is -19 dBm
then the directivity has to be better that -34 dB.
For this kind of directivity tou will need a VSWR
bridge (very expensive).
If you are using
a four port coupler then also terminate the unused
coupled port.
Good luck, RFTEJerry
|
|
|
|
|
CyberOli |
Post subject:
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:11 am
|
|
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007
8:09 am Posts: 12 Location: Belgium
|
I don't have any idea about the value i have to
measure. That's whyI need to do it
.
Thanks for your advices. Can someone
clarify my mind concerning the vector value (asked
in my previous post)?
|
|
|
|
|
nubbage |
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 6:24 am
|
|
|
General |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006
12:07 pm Posts: 268 Location: London UK
|
Hi CyberOli The Reflection Coefficient is actually
a vector value, because it is a computation using
a resistive reference (eg 50 ohms) as the source
and a combination of resistance and reactance as
the load to be evaluated. You are right, being
a vector does shift the position of the minimum
around if you are using a probe carriage type test
setup. VSWR is a calculation made just using
the magnitude of the Reflection Coefficient vector.
Jerry's answer is much more comprehensive than
I have given, but I hope my point, about ensuring
the coupled arms are always matched, is clear.
|
|
|
|
|
CyberOli |
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:03 am
|
|
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007
8:09 am Posts: 12 Location: Belgium
|
Yeah i have well understood you in fact, but that
was just to be sure. I suppose i can assume that
the load is purely resistive in a first time, i
don't think it has that much importance in my proble.
The goal of this measure if to see if there is a
reflected energy and try to avoid it.
Thank
you for your help, you were all helpfull!
|
|
Posted 11/12/2012
|
|
|
|