Search RFCafe.com                           
      More Than 17,000 Unique Pages
Please support me by ADVERTISING!
Serving a Pleasant Blend of Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow™ Please Support My Advertisers!
   Formulas & Data
Electronics | RF
Mathematics
Mechanics | Physics
     AI-Generated
     Technical Data
Pioneers | Society
Companies | Parts
Principles | Assns


 About | Sitemap
Homepage Archive
        Resources
Articles, Forums Calculators, Radar
Magazines, Museum
Radio Service Data
Software, Videos
     Entertainment
Crosswords, Humor Cogitations, Podcast
Quotes, Quizzes
   Parts & Services
1000s of Listings
 Vintage Magazines
Electronics World
Popular Electronics
Radio & TV News
QST | Pop Science
Popular Mechanics
Radio-Craft
Radio-Electronics
Short Wave Craft
Electronics | OFA
Saturday Eve Post

Software: RF Cascade Workbook
RF Stencils Visio | RF Symbols Visio
RF Symbols Office | Cafe Press
Espresso Engineering Workbook

Aegis Power  |  Alliance Test
Centric RF  |  Empower RF
ISOTEC  |  Reactel  |  RFCT
San Fran Circuits

Noisecom

Exodus Advanced Communications Best in Class RF Amplifier SSPAs

Crane Aerospace Electronics Microwave Solutions

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low-priced products, all of which I created.

RF Cascade Workbook for Excel

RF & Electronics Symbols for Visio

RF & Electronics Symbols for Office

RF & Electronics Stencils for Visio

RF Workbench

T-Shirts, Mugs, Cups, Ball Caps, Mouse Pads

These Are Available for Free

Espresso Engineering Workbook™

Smith Chart™ for Excel

Innovative Power Products Cool Chip Thermal Dissipation

Headline Capitalization - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues - primarily having to spend time purging garbage posts from the board. At some point I might start the RF Cafe Forums again if the phpBB software gets better at filtering spam.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

Loren A.
 Post subject: Headline Capitalization
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:35 am 
 
Captain
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 4:12 pm
Posts: 11
Hey Kirt I noticed that your headlines and titles don't use all caps like most places do. It there a reason for that? I'm not criticizing, just wondering about it. Maybe I'm missing something. Keep up the good work. :-D


 
   
 
Kirt Blattenberger
 Post subject:
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 1:26 pm 
 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 2:02 pm
Posts: 653
Location: Erie, PA
Greetings Loren A.:

Most of the news sites do not comply with any form of grammar rules. I have adopted what has been standard rules for eons. Here they are, as retrieved from the http://www.rasmusen.org website.

Capitalization Rules for Titles. I recommend the NIVA, Inc. Writer's Block site, "Writing Tips," http://www.writersblock.ca/tips/index.htm. It has a page on the "Subjunctives" and another on "Capitalization in Titles".
NIVA follows the general rules for capitalizing words in document titles set out in The Chicago Manual of Style (with one minor exception-- see the note in rule 3):

Always capitalize the first and the last word.


Capitalize all nouns, pronouns, adjectives, verbs, adverbs, and subordinate conjunctions ("as", "because", "although").


Lowercase all articles, coordinate conjunctions ("and", "or", "nor"), and prepositions regardless of length, when they are other than the first or last word. (Note: NIVA prefers to capitalize prepositions of five characters or more ("after", "among", "between").)


Lowercase the "to" in an infinitive.

Rule 1 extends to the first and last word of phrases separated by colons, so you should write "The Colon: An Important Mark, Yet...".

Following Chicago (not NIVA), one should capitalize the following words:


"In" as an adverb ("Bringing In the Sheaves", in contrast to "The Fish Was in the River")

Subordinating Conjunctions: "after," "although," "as," "because," "before," "how," "if," "once," "since," "than," "that," "though," "till, " "until," "when," "where," "whether," "while."


Do not capitalize the following words:

"In" as a preposition or as part of an infinitive ("He Wanted to Be Tall")

Short Prepositions: "at," "but," "by," "down," "for," "from," "in," "into," "like," "near," "of," "off," "on," "onto," "out," "over," "past," "till," "to," "up," "upon," "with."

Long Prepositions: "about," "above," "across," "after," "against," "along," "among," "around," "before," "behind," "below," "beneath," "beside," "between," "beyond," "despite," "down," "during," "except," "inside," "outside," "over," "past," "since," "through," "throughout," "toward," "under," "underneath," "until," "within," "without".

Co-ordinating conjunction: "and," "but," "or," "nor," "for," "so," "yet", "but," "for."

"But " and "for" are sometimes prepositions and sometimes conjunctions.
For such things as knowing which kind of conjunction is which, I like Heather MacFadyen's University of Ottawa site.

Now, let's think about how to choose which rules to follow. I think I prefer Chicago's style to NIVA's, though I waiver in my choice. I couldn't find any discussion of reasons for the rules. There are two levels of reasons.


1. Given what we are used to as 21st-Century Americans, what is best for us?

2. If we were starting from a clean slate, with no preconceptions, what rule would be best for us?

If we were starting with no preconceptions, capitalizing every word would be best. It saves thought for the writer, and doesn't make much difference to the reader. But we are used to having some words in lower case, and having some words be lower-case does help readability a little. One possible rule would be to alternate upper and lower case, like this: "A history Of punctuation For the Unlearned". But that looks too odd for us now. Another rule would be to capitalize only the important words, which is what many people do and roughly follows the conventional rule laid out above. Highlighting the important words aids in skimming titles. By this logic, the Chicago rule is better than the NIVA rule, because prepositions are unimportant words, no matter how long.

On the other hand, this logic also goes against the rule of not capitalizing "to" in infinitives. The infinitive "to go" is more like one word than two, and it starts with "t", not "g". It would perhaps make more sense to write "To go" than "to Go" in a title. Here are some examples


1. "To Be or Not To Be"
"To Be or Not to Be"

2. "The Way To Go Home"
"The Way to Go Home"

3. "Methods To Prevent or To Treat Malaria in Africa"
"Methods to Prevent or to Treat Malaria in Africa"
The Chicago Manual of Style collects a group of discussions of fine points of title capitalization. Its question and answer page has lots of fine points of style. This is *not* a FAQ's page, though. It does not have frequently asked questions-- quite the opposite. The Chicago Manual is searchable on the Web, but only if you pay for a subscription.

_________________
- Kirt Blattenberger :smt024
RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster




Posted  11/12/2012
Innovative Power Products Cool Chip Thermal Dissipation
withwave microwave devices - RF Cafe



PCB Directory (Manufacturers)