|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Broken U.S. Patent System
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37
The USPTO's attempt to quash the disruptive domain of the 'Patent Troll' (a term coined by Intel lawyers) phenomenon of the last two decades has resulted in scores of duly assigned patents being IPR'd (inter partes review) by the very office whose examiners declared the inventions to be original in the first place. The unexpected consequence of the AIA is that the very same procedures designed to help invalidate intellectual property (IP) claims contained in the massive portfolios of patent trolls are being effectively used against small-time patent holders. Teams of lawyers, paralegals, and specialized prior art searchers perform extensive USPTO archive document hunts, and are having a lot of success. The burden of proof of originality is and always has been primarily the responsibility of the applicant. Patent examiners can only allocate a relatively small amount of time to research. The best defense, as the football analogy goes, is a strong offense. Hiring a legal team is no guarantee of a bullet-proof patent. When you file a patent application, be sure to have exhaustively searched for prior art yourself, and do not be surprised to learn what you honestly thought was an original idea is in fact not. The USPTO has an entire section devoted to prior art searching, so be sure to use it. "The Greatest American Invention," is a fairly long article, but well worth reading - especially if you are a patent holder or expect to be one someday.
Posted November 3, 2016 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||