|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Van de Graaff Generator in the Tail Boom |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To summarize, the tail rotor on some R/C helicopters is driven by a rubber belt running through a metal or carbon fiber tube (other methods use a rotating drive shaft or a separate electric motor on the tail rotor). As the image here shows, the configuration forms a very nice Van de Graaff generator. Under conditions of low humidity and an unlubricated belt, a charge high enough to cause coronal discharge at both ends of the system can accumulate. Interference with the older FM radio systems is guaranteed, and when really severe it even occurs in modern spread spectrum systems that use a combination of frequency hopping and direct sequence (Futaba, JR, Spektrum, etc.). My first R/C helicopter (a DuBro TriStar) waaaay back in the late 1970s generated severe electrical noise due to the interaction of steel gears. The radio system operated at 72 MHz so I expect the noise was getting into the IF stage in the receiver, but it was so bad that I could see the servos jittering with no input from the transmitter. I tried wrapping the receiver and servos in aluminum foil and bonding as many bolted parts as possible, but never did completely eliminate the problem. In retrospect, what might have worked would have been to fabricate spring-loaded finger stock to rub against the main rotor shaft and tail rotor shaft that would be bonded along with everything else. Then again, that might have just added even more noise.
Posted August 28, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||