Pollution face mask wearing in China, c2013. (ZDNet.com
COVID−19, aka Wuhan Flu, face mask wearing in New York City,
About a decade ago, photos began appearing on news websites showing Chinese citizens
walking around wearing face masks in order to filter out the massive air pollution
pouring from city factories and coal-fired electric power generation plants. Articles
were written advising on the best types of
face masks to use while visiting or working in China. The only topic about China
competing for shock factor at the time was the rash of
suicides at Foxconn as the poor soulless, hopeless workers who build our inexpensive
electronics products jumped from upper factory windows and roofs.
Since around March of this year, nearly every location in the United States and
around the world is looking like China did for the entire last decade. A worldwide
pandemic was declared because of a deadly virus which originated from the Wuhan
area of China. State governors, with a few exceptions, instituted draconian rules
mandating the wearing of face masks and proper "social distancing" (a contrived
contemporary controlling term I detest as much as "shelter in place"). Heavy legal
and financial penalties are threatened for noncompliance. Some relief came by summertime
as shuttered businesses were allowed to re-open under reduced capacity conditions.
As autumn progresses, many of the restrictions have been reimposed. An awful lot
of people have lost their lifetime investments of money and effort due to the mandates.
Now, the streets of the entire world look like those in China, so last year's
photos of pollution-plagued
Xingtai and Baoding do not seem so alarming this year - and evidently for years
to come. Isn't that convenient? Maybe the answer to getting rid of mandatory
face mask wearing is to solve China's air pollution problem so their citizens do
not have to walk around with them on, then the rest of us can be free again.
One way to clean the air there would be to require that they comply now with the
air quality standards set forth by the worshiped
Paris Accord on climate, rather than giving them developing nation status and
a pass until 2030.
Intense debate continues over the effectiveness of mask wearing due to the extremely
small size of the virus compared to cloth weave spaces. The Centers for Disease
has a list of studies on mask wearing, but all conclude that unless the wearer is
careful to frequently wash it and wear it properly, not much - if any - protection
is realized. I frequently see many people with the non-N95 surgical type masks that
are worn wrong, and/or are filthy, and/or have a degraded surface. I've even seen
ones worn inside-out, meaning the former "contaminated" outside now faces the mouth
and nostrils. I've seen people wearing the clear plastic face shield loaded on the
inside with spittle and maybe even snot - very gross.
Many people, including doctors and virologists, believe at this point the COVID−19
virus has weakened as the most potent strains die with their hosts and the surviving
strains mutate into less potent forms. The Wuhan Flu tests have been shown to overproduce
positive indications as they trigger on impotent virus fragments and otherwise contaminated
or compromised samples. As a result of the overly cautious mandates, population
herd immunity for COVID−19 and all other viruses and infectious diseases is being
lessened. Yes, people suffer and die from COVID−19, but studies show the overall
impact of people who suffer and die from lack of medical services, socialization,
and a meaningful existence (through work) may be even greater. We still do not have
reliable numbers for cases where someone dies because of COVID−19 as opposed to
dying of some other malady while also having COVID−19. Evidence also exists of medical
personnel purposely inflating the COVID−19 numbers, further muddying the waters.
Perhaps the biggest tragedy with COVID−19 is that the whole thing has been so
politicized that nobody can be trusted. The same politicians who told us in January
and February that there was no danger and we can go to Chinese New Year celebrations
in the U.S. are now blaming the ones who were ringing early warning bells. State
governors who transported vulnerable elderly people from hospitals back to nursing
homes to die are now lecturing the rest of us on refusing to take responsibility
for our actions. We have been admonished endlessly to "trust the science" or to
"listen to the science," except now they are encouraging people not to take the
new vaccine, developed by the world's top scientists, because it might not be any
good. After first being told we will wear face masks and observe social distancing
until a vaccine is ready, now the national "expert" says since
the impending vaccine is "only" 90-95% effective, we'll all need to keep wearing
masks because even if we get the vaccine, we might be part of the 5-10% that is
doesn't work for. These people are insane!
When the promised vaccine is available, Melanie and I will be in line for it.
We've gotten annual flu shots for as long as I can remember. We are both 60+ in
age and healthy and do not often get sick, so being a "Guinea pig" for the sake
of our fellow men is probably not a big risk. Maybe by doing so the brave social
warriors at the news outlets will feel safe to get one, too. Of course my guess
is that privately they'll use their privileged positions to obtain some of the first
administered shots while publically bad-mouthing the effort. Some of those same
people have likely been secretly taking one or more of the prophylactic treatments
Yes, any suffering or death due to COVID−19 is tragic, but never forget: COVID−19
originated in the Wuhan area of China and was allowed by their communist government
to propagate throughout the world. Contrary to what many would like you to believe,
Donald Trump did NOT create it in a White House lab off of the Oval Office.
Children wearing face masks in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, c1972
Here is an interesting tidbit I ran across about mask wearing (voluntary, not
mandatory) history in the U.S. For those who were around at the time, memories come
to mind of the U.S. in the 1950s through the 70s where in places like Los Angeles
and Pittsburgh the air
was so thick with pollution that visibility on an otherwise clear day was less than
a mile. If you watch some of the Prime Time television shows from the era (e.g.
Dragnet c1968), you can
see the pollution in the background. You probably have not seen photos (to the right)
of the people who went around with handkerchiefs on their faces in the worst of
the areas. Through environmental regulations that came with heavy penalties for
violation, things were cleared up significantly. Scientists and engineers came up
with methods for scrubbing industrial and transportation exhaust, while also developing
new fuels and machinery that were more ecologically friendly. I am far from being
a Big Government guy, but I do concede that there are things that if left entirely
to the whims of individuals and corporations, greed (and a bit of stupidity) can
ruin the quality of life for all.
When working at Westinghouse Oceanic Division in Annapolis. Maryland, in the
1980s, many of the engineers there had transferred from the headquarters area of
Pittsburgh. They all had stories of how their mothers tried to keep windows and
doors closed as much as possible since otherwise black soot built up quickly on
surfaces in the house. Their floors needed constant washing to remove traipsed in
soot. That was so for everyone in the area, not just those who worked at the mills.
Most would have been kids there in the 1950s and 60s at the height of the pollution.
Famed architect Frank Lloyd Wright, who lived in his well-known
Fallingwater estate near
Pittsburgh, was asked once what the best course of action would be to fix the city's
woes. His response was, "Raze it and
start over." As I drive past the city on I79 a few times each year, I can tell you
the city is vastly cleaner today with no obvious air pollution, though scars of
the past remain.
Posted November 18, 2020