August 1964 Electronics World
Wax nostalgic about and learn from the history of early electronics. See articles
Electronics World, published May 1959
- December 1971. All copyrights hereby acknowledged.
In 1988, the National Bureau
of Standards (NBS) was re-named
National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST) because a government bureaucrat needed to justify his/her
position and the financing to change all the signs, brochures, and letterhead would
be paid for with OPM (Other People's Money, pronounced like 'opium'). Regardless
of its name, the NBS is charged with establishing, maintaining, and enforcing standard
units of measure for the country, as well as with coordinating standard units with
other countries. It is interesting to read how standards have changed over the years,
and what methods have been suggested for establishing those standards; e.g., the
Ohm (Ω) could have been based on a foot of copper wire weighing 100 grains,
an English mile of No. 16 copper wire, a kilometer of iron wire 4 mm in diameter,
and a column of mercury 100 cm long and 1 mm. in cross-section at 0°C. This 1964
article delves into the historical aspect of some common electrical standards for
resistance, capacitance, inductance, voltage, and current.
Units and Standards of Electrical Measure
The practical standard for d.c. voltage is provided in this country
by saturated standard cells forming National Reference Standards. These cells are
extremely stable, but sensitive to change in temperature. Both the reference cells
and cells sent to the Bureau for calibration are kept in a circulating oil bath
whose temperature is electrically controlled to within a few thousandths of one
degree of 28 degrees centigrade.
Examination of our National Standards, their derivation, maintenance, and
accuracies, and an assessment of the present state of the art.
By Forest K. Harris
Chief, Absolute Electrical Measurements Section National Bureau of Standards
If we wish to say how large some physical quantity is, our description of its
size has two parts - a unit and a number. The unit is a defined reference amount
of the quantity; and, if our statement is to be understood, everyone who is concerned
must agree on the size of the unit. The number, which completes our statement, tells
how much bigger or smaller is the quantity we are discussing than the defined unit
quantity. The size of the unit can be fixed by definition, quite independently of
any measurement, and therefore can be exact. We can arrive at the numerical part
of our statement only through measurement-this number is subject to the errors of
the measuring process by which we obtain it, and therefore can never be exact.
Thus if a statement of quantity is to have meaning, there must first be agreement
on the size of the unit. Next, there must be acceptable reference standards to represent
the physical embodiment of the defined unit or some multiple of it; and it is through
such reference standards that measurement errors are controlled.
Reference standards form the basis for the calibration of measuring devices and
systems; and, to the extent that their assignment derives from National or International
Standards, they can also serve to coordinate measurements made at different times
and places. It will be the purpose of this article to examine our National Standards
of electrical measure, their derivation and maintenance, and, in addition to these
items, to assess the present state of the art in just a few of the important areas
of electrical measurements.
History of the Electrical Units
In the years following the promulgation of Ohm's Law (1827), many suggestions
were made regarding a standard (and unit) of resistance. Examples were: (1) a foot
of copper wire weighing 100 grains; (2) an English mile of No. 16 copper wire; (3)
a kilometer of iron wire 4 mm. in diameter; and (4) a column of mercury 100 cm.
long and 1 mm. in cross-section at 0°C. The last of these units was used for
a time in Germany, and was known as the Siemens unit. It is interesting to note
that it differs from to day's resistance unit by a little more than 6%. During this
same period the e.m.f. of the Daniell (zinc-copper) cell was widely used as the
unit of voltage.
By the middle of the 19th century the work of Gauss and Weber had shown that
electric and magnetic quantities could be measured in terms of mechanical units.
Then in 1861, the British Association for the Advancement of Science formed a Committee
on Electrical Units and Standards with Maxwell as chairman. This committee realized
the value of a correlated system of electrical and mechanical units based on the
metric system - which was already familiar to scientific workers through the world;
and in 1863 (just over a century ago) the committee recommended a set of "absolute
practical" units that were decimal multiples of the centimeter-gram-second electromagnetic
units. By "absolute" was meant that the unit was defined directly in terms of mechanical
units; and "practical" signified that the unit was of a convenient size for practical
engineering measurements. The following is a list of the British Association recommendations:
|1 coulomb =
||0.1 c.g.s. unit of charge
|1 ampere =
||0.1 c.g.s. unit of current
|1 volt =
||108 c.g.s. units of potential difference
|1 ohm =
||109 c.g.s. units of resistance
|1 joule =
|1 watt =
||107 ergs per second
These units were accepted on an international basis in 1881 by the Paris Electrical
Congress and have been formally recognized as the electrical units in the United
States by Congressional acts. (The most recent such act is Public Law 617 of the
81st Congress.) The choice of 109 as the conversion factor between ohms
and c.g.s. units of resistance brought the size of the new unit close to that of
the existing German unit (the Siemens unit, smaller than the ohm by about 6%). Similarly,
with 108 chosen as the factor between the volt and the c.g.s. unit of
e.m.f., the new unit did not differ greatly from the Daniell-cell unit (within about
20%). Having fixed the values of these two conversion factors, the others are all
fixed by the simple relations - such as Ohm's Law - that exist between the units.
The wisdom of the BA committee's choice will be seen when we consider that if
the e.m.f. of the Daniell cell had been chosen as an electrical unit together with
one of the suggested units of resistance (a mile of No. 16 copper wire), the electrical
and mechanical units of power and energy would have differed by a factor of about
25, whereas with the chosen units they are identical.
The BA committee sponsored "absolute" experiments that resulted in the assignment
of values to a number of wire standards that were distributed to various laboratories
in the interest of international agreement. These standards were not completely
stable, and the assigned value of one was found by Rowland in 1878 to differ by
1.5% from its intended absolute value.
Fig. 1 - Present absolute electrical units, used since 1948.
During the closing years of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th,
national laboratories were organized in a number of countries including the United
States, to preserve and disseminate the units of measure; and in 1910 representatives
of the national laboratories of Germany, France, Great Britain, and the United States
met in Washington to compare standard resistors and standard cells whose values
had been assigned in terms of their national units, and to resolve differences among
the various silver voltameters. As a result of this meeting each representative
returned to his own national laboratory with a group of resistors and standard
cells whose values were assigned in terms of a mutually acceptable "International"
ohm and volt, realized through the "reproducible" units.
During the next four decades, the various national laboratories maintained their
electrical units more or less in terms of these groups of resistors and cells; but
by 1930 it was quite generally argued that the mercury ohm and silver ampere, on
which the "International" system of units was based, were not reproducible with
sufficient accuracy for scientific and technological purposes-in short, the techniques
of measurement were outgrowing them; and also, unacceptably large discrepancies
were showing up in comparisons between the national standards of some countries.
So it was agreed that "absolute" ohm and ampere experiments would be performed at
some of the national laboratories, and that the results of these experiments would
be used to reassign the various national units on an "absolute" basis. At an international
meeting in 1935 it was hoped that the transition to the "absolute" units could be
made on January 1, 1940; but the outbreak of war in the summer of 1939 interfered
with this plan.
Over-all view of the NBS helical-coil balance. In the center
of the coil (bottom) is a small movable coil which is attached to the arm of the
precision balance. This arrangement measures change in force on the small current-carrying
coil when current in the two parts of the outer coil is reversed. From the change
in force and the dimensions of the coils, the exact current value in amperes is
The transition was finally made on January 1, 1948, with changes amounting to
a few hundredths of a percent. For example, the "International" ohm as then maintained
at the National Bureau of Standards was stated to be 1.000495 absolute ohms, and
the "International" volt, 1.000330 absolute volts. Conversion factors for the remaining
electrical units can be derived in terms of these two factors and the simple relations
that exist between the units.
It should be noted that if the meter, kilogram, and second are used in place
of the centimeter, gram, and second as mechanical units, and if the permeability
of free space is assigned the value 10-7, the absolute system of electrical
units becomes identical-with the practical system. Alternatively, since four arbitrarily
chosen quantities can be used to define a system of electrical units, it has been
suggested that the meter, kilogram, second, and ampere be used as the basis of the
defined system of units, the m.k.s.a. system. This was adopted by the General Conference
of Weights and Measures in 1960 as a part of the general system to be known as the
Systeme International d'Unites (which is commonly abbreviated SI).
Experimental Realization of Units
Section 12 of the Public Law that defines the electrical units contains the following
statement: "It shall be the duty of the National Bureau of Standards to establish
the values of the primary electrical units in absolute measure; and the legal values
for these units shall be those represented or derived from National reference standards
maintained by the National Bureau of Standards."
Two types of "absolute" measurements have been used in assigning numerical values
to our basic electrical standards in terms of the mechanical units. The ohm is evaluated
in terms of length and time; the ampere in terms of length, mass, and time. (See
The absolute-ohm determinations on which our "legal" ohm are based were performed
in the National Bureau of Standards and in the national laboratories of other countries.
These determinations have involved an inductor (either self or mutual) of such construction
that its value can be computed from its measured dimensions together with the conventionally
assigned permeability of the space around it. This inductance is supplied with a
periodically varying current and its reactance at the known frequency is, in effect,
compared with the resistance of a standard resistor.
A similar experiment could involve the comparison of a capacitive reactance and
a resistance; and such a determination would have the advantage that the electrical
field of a capacitor can be completely confined by a shield so that the capacitance
value is independent of anything outside the shield, whereas the magnetic field
of an inductor cannot be limited to be free from proximity effects. However, it
is only within the past few years that a practical capacitor geometry capable of
simple measurement and computation has been described in terms of a new theorem
in electrostatics-the Thompson-Lampard theorem. The value of such a capacitor can
be assigned with sufficient accuracy to make attractive an absolute-ohm determination
in terms of capacitance; and such determinations have been made, although their
results have not yet (1964) been incorporated into the "legal" ohm.
The 100-ohm-per-step dial of a universal ratio set is being checked
against one of the group of 100-ohm reference standards.
In an absolute-ampere determination, a pair of coils is arranged so that the
force between them when they carry current can be measured in terms of the force
of gravity acting on a known mass - thus the units of measure are length, mass,
and time. The current, measured in absolute amperes, is passed through a standard
resistor whose value is known in absolute ohms. The resulting voltage drop is compared
to the electromotive force of a standard cell, and its value is assigned in terms
of absolute volts.
"Legal" Electrical Units
The absolute measurements on which are based the assignment of the National reference
standards are time consuming and require great care and skill. Their occasional
repetition, to maintain surveillance on the constancy of the national standard,
is desirable. But for the purpose of providing a continuing measurement capability,
groups of wire-wound resistors and of standard cells constitute the National reference
standards and form the basis of the "legal" electrical units.
The National reference standard of resistance for the United States is a group
of ten 1-ohm resistors of special construction. Their values were assigned on January
1, 1948, in terms of an international agreement based on the results of the various
absolute-ohm determinations. The "legal" unit of resistance is preserved in terms
of their group average, which is assumed not to have changed since the 1948 assignment.
The resistors of the group are regularly intercompared to about a part in 107.
In addition, our national standard is compared at regular intervals, through measurements
made at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in Sevres, France, with
the standards maintained by National laboratories of other countries.
The maximum net change in any of the group with respect to the group average
has been a little over 2 ppm (parts per million) in the 30 years that have elapsed
since the group was first set up. In the international comparisons over the past
decade, the differences between our unit of resistance and that maintained by the
International Bureau have never been greater than 1 ppm; and in only one instance
was the difference greater than 0.4 ppm. It is believed very unlikely that the "legal"
ohm-maintained in terms of the average of this group of ten resistors - differs
from the defined absolute ohm by as much as 4 ppm; and there is evidence in terms
of recent absolute-ohm determinations (capacitive) that the difference is no more
than 1 ppm (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2. Available accuracy of various standard resistors.
Fig. 3 - Present voltage and voltage-ratio accuracies.
This large, double-walled standard 1-ohm resistor is used to
maintain the standard unit of resistance.
Fig. 4 - Present current and current-ratio accuracies.
At that time there were no national laboratories where standards could be checked;
and there was a need for "reproducible" standards that could be set up in any laboratory
to duplicate the units. In 1893 the Chicago Electrical Congress fixed on a mercury
column 106.3 cm. long and with a cross-section of 1 sq. mm. to represent the ohm
at 0° C. In 1892 the British Association adopted as a "reproducible" ampere,
the current that would deposit silver from a silver nitrate solution under specified
conditions at the rate of 0.001118 gram per second. The apparatus used for this
measurement was called a "voltameter."
The National reference standard of e.m.f. is a group of 44 saturated standard
cells (commonly referred to as Weston cells), maintained continuously at a temperature
of 28 ± 0.01° C, and held at 28 ±0.001° C during intercomparisons. Eleven
of the cells have been in the reference group since 1906; of the remainder, 7 made
in 1932 and 26 made in 1949 were added to the group in 1955. New cells are made
periodically of carefully purified materials, and are kept under the same conditions
as the reference group and compared with it regularly. Thus a cell having a known
history of constancy is always available for replacement, if one of the National
reference group fails. The cells of the reference group are intercompared regularly
and their average value is assumed to be constant. It is in terms of this group
average and its 1948 assignment that the "legal" volt is maintained.
Improved standard of capacitance. This design, based on a recently discovered
theorem in electrostatics, allows capacitance value to be calculated directly in
terms of length.
This unit is regularly compared with those of other countries at the International
Bureau. Over the past decade the differences between our unit and the one maintained
by the International Bureau have generally been less than 2 ppm, although on one
occasion (1953) the difference amounted to about 3 ppm (Fig. 3).
Recently an additional means of checking the constancy of our National electrical
units has become available by using a natural physical constant - the gyromagnetic
ratio of protons in a sample of pure water. These elementary charged particles are
continually spinning like miniature tops. Because of this spin and their electric
charge, they behave like magnets and tend to align their spin axis in the direction
of the ambient magnetic field. When they are thus oriented and then disturbed, they
precess about the direction of the magnetic field, just as does a spinning top or
gyroscope in the earth's gravitational field. This precession frequency, which we
can measure very accurately, can be used to measure the strength of the field.
In our experiment, the field is set up within a precisely made solenoid and can
be computed from the coil dimensions and the measured current in the coil. This
current is measured by comparing the voltage drop it produces in a standard resistor
to the e.m.f. of a standard cell. If the measured precession frequency is constant
we know that the current has not changed and therefore that the ratio of the National
volt to the ohm has not changed - strong evidence that neither has changed, since
it is quite unlikely that they would both drift in such a way that their ratio would
remain constant. A series of measurements over the past four years indicate that
the Bureau's ampere has been constant over that interval, the maximum departure
from the mean value being 0.4 ppm (Fig. 4).
While all available data indicate constancy of the National reference standard
of e.m.f., there is evidence - both from absolute-ampere determinations and from
consideration of internal consistency of the assigned values of various atomic constants-that
the "legal" volt (maintained in terms of the National reference standard) differs
from the defined absolute volt by about 10 ppm. Certainly there is need for further
absolute measurements, and there is now under consideration an absolute-volt determination
directly in terms of the amount of force that is associated with a potential difference
between the electrodes of a capacitor.
Capacitance and Inductance
Fig. 5. The accuracy of capacitance measurements.
Fig. 6. The attainable accuracy of inductance measurements.
There are no national reference standards for capacitance and inductance in the
pattern used for the National reference standards of resistance and e.m.f. However,
the 1-pf. computable capacitor used in the absolute-ohm determination can be set
up and measured without great difficulty; and the assignment of its value is believed
to be correct within 1-2 ppm in terms of the defined absolute unit. Studies are
in progress to develop stable capacitance standards in the range 1-103
pf.; and in this range, the values of "ideal" capacitors can be compared within
1-2 parts in 107. In this context, the term "ideal" means a standard
which is completely stable and whose value is independent of ambient conditions.
For values of capacitance greater than 103 pf., the attainable measurement
accuracy falls off, and is less by a factor of about 10 at the 1-μf. level of
capacitance (Fig. 5).
Inductances are regularly measured at low frequencies in terms of capacitance
and resistance, for example in a Maxwell-Wien bridge. In the middle range of inductance
(1-100 millihenrys) and at a frequency of 1 kc., an "ideal" inductor can be measured
in terms of real capacitors and resistors to about 0.01%. Measurement accuracy falls
off at higher and lower values. In fact, if one were to plot measurement accuracy
for any kind of quantity against magnitude, the typical shape of the curve would
be a triangle with its apex (the region of best accuracy) in the intermediate range
of values (Fig. 6).
Accuracy of Measurement
For resistance and voltage measurements, where a national reference standard
is maintained, the apex of the "accuracy triangle" coincides with the value at which
the standard is maintained. That this must be so is apparent when one considers
that at this value one-to-one comparison or substitution methods are available for
measurement, with only small differences involved. As one departs from the reference
value, measurement techniques grow more involved and complicated; and the additional
sources of error are present. For example, the accuracy with which a ratio can be
established may need to be considered as part of the problem. Thus, whereas 1-ohm
standards can be compared to 1-2 parts in 107, when we reach 10-3
ohm on one side of our accuracy triangle and 106 ohms on the other side,
state-of-art accuracy has fallen off to perhaps 4-5 ppm, somewhat more than a factor
Using potentiometers and appropriate voltage-divider techniques, direct voltages
can be measured within 10 ppm between 10-2 and 103 volts,
and standard cells (at the 1-volt level) can be compared within 1-2 parts in 107.
Direct currents can be established at the 1-ampere level within a few parts in 107,
and within 10 ppm for lower values down to perhaps 10-4 ampere. In the
higher current range (above 1 ampere) where measurement is complicated by the heating
effect of power that must be dissipated in the measuring equipment, measurement
accuracy is somewhat less - perhaps a few parts in 105 up to 103
In transferring from direct to alternating voltage, an additional uncertainty
is involved, amounting to perhaps 10 ppm in state-of-art voltage transfers up to
20 kc. between 1 to 500 volts. In current transfer over the same frequency span,
the state-of-art transfer uncertainty is about the same, 10 ppm, in the 5-10 milliampere
range where no shunts are required. The use of shunts or other circuit elements
designed to carry currents of higher magnitude, involve further uncertainties because
of their inductance. The total transfer uncertainty, up to about 20 amperes, need
not amount to more than 0.01%.
In this article, we have described and examined our National Standards of electrical
measure. We have covered their derivation and maintenance, as well as assessed the
present state of the art regarding measurement accuracy
Posted January 18, 2019
(updated from original post on February