|
August 1966 Popular Electronics
 Table of Contents
Wax nostalgic about and learn from the history of early electronics. See articles
from
Popular Electronics,
published October 1954 - April 1985. All copyrights are hereby acknowledged.
|
Popular Electronics
reader Frederic D. Barber, Jr., was having none of the newfangled designations for standard
physical units as reported in the April 1966 issue. He, and evidently many others, was
not ready to accept the replacement of terms such as cycles per second (cps) with Hertz
(Hz), or seemingly any other change that included honoring a person by using his/her
name. We don't know whether he shunned units of
Farads for
capacitance, Ohms
for resistance, or Henries for inductance.
Popular Electronics printed in
April 1966
its first notice of new frequency units to be used beginning with the June edition.
The May issue included a piece titled, "Comes the Revolution
- or - '40 Million Frenchmen Can't Be Wrong'." Predictably, not everyone liked it.
With the June issue came the promised change and along with it the first in a series
of reader
responses. Here is a
reader's opinion from the August issue.
Old World Standards Breaking Through - Reader Response
Colpittsillator and Marconio?
 When I saw your article entitled "Old World Standards
Breaking Through" (April, 1966), my first impression - and hope - was that this article
was part of a well-planned and perfectly executed April fool joke. Then came the May
issue, which all but eliminated my hopes for a prolonged sanity in electronics. In the
June issue ... I see the end of reason and the beginning of a mad rush to do away with
the traditional names of inventions and rename them after their inventors. I can picture
the situation now. There will be no more oscillators, no more transistors, and no more
radios. In their places, we will find Colpittsillators, Bardeenabrattainistors, and Marconios.
Try to imagine telling someone how you used your Colpittsillator to test the Bardeenabrattainistorized
a.f. section of your Marconio, only to find that it wouldn't respond to frequencies under
two hundred hertz!
Frederic D. Barber, Jr.
Brookfield, Wis.
Just for your Edisonification, Fred, our loaded mailbags also convey strong thoughts
in favor of Hertz, but most of the comments can be summed up in one word ... "Nertz"!
Posted March 23, 2018
|
