January 17, 1964 Electronics
[Table of Contents]
Wax nostalgic about and learn from the history of early electronics.
See articles from Electronics,
published 1930 - 1988. All copyrights hereby acknowledged.
According to author Albert Hilbinger,
dynamic range down to DC and circuit simplicity offset the low efficiency of Hall-effect
modulators. The mixer circuit output has a suppressed carrier signal, making it a true
product of the two inputs (fLO ± IF in the frequency domain). Evidently the scheme
never gained wide acceptance in the industry because a search of the term does not produce
much - other than this article. Achieving a suppressed carrier with standard diode mixers
requires a quadrature arrangement using two mixers and a pair of 90° power splitters,
which nowadays is done handily within a single integrated circuit. Sensors are the main
exploitation for the Hall effect these days. They are widely used as proximity sensors,
speed sensors, position sensing, and current sensing.
New Uses for Hall-Effect Modulators
By Albert R. Hilbinger
Aircraft Armaments Inc., Cockeysville, Maryland
Dynamic range down to d-c and circuit simplicity offset the low efficiency of Hall-effect
modulators. Output is a suppressed carrier signal, a true product of the two inputs
Hall modulators are inherently compact. Trimmer resistors of Fig.
2B are seen in right view
Waveform of pulse-modulator output for 5-kc output.
Waveform of pulse-modulator output for 5-kc output (expanded)
The main trouble with Hall-effect multipliers at present is their low efficiency.
Whether or not this efficiency can ever be substantially raised is problematical, since
it depends on a materials constant called the Hall coefficient. The Hall coefficient
is much higher for semiconductors than it is for metals but still leaves much to be desired.
But efficiency is only one parameter, and Hall multipliers have some important advantages.
Hall effect devices are useful as modulators since their output voltage is proportional
to the product of two input voltages or currents.1, 2, 3, 4 In spite of an
inherently low efficiency, Hall-effect multipliers offer the advantages of simplicity
and wide dynamic range.
Circuit - Hall output voltage, as indicated in Fig. 1A, is
Eh = (RhIcB/t) X 10-8 volt
where Rh = Hall coefficient (a semiconductor material constant) in cm3/coulomb,
Ic = semiconductor element control current in amperes, B = magnetic flux density
in gauss, and t = semiconductor element thickness in centimeters.
Flux density produced in an air gap in a ferromagnetic core operated below saturation
can be expressed as
B ≈ 0.4πNIb/Lg
where N = number of turns in coil wound on core, Ib = coil current in amperes,
and Lg = length of air gap in core in centimeters.
Substituting Eq. 2 for B in Eq. 1 and combining constants yields
Eh = KIcIb
where K = 0.4 πNRh X 10-8/t Lg
Thus the Hall voltage is a true product of two applied currents. If the currents are
expressed in terms of the voltages which produced them
Eh = K'EcEb
where K' = K/Rc Rb; and Rc = resistance of control-current
input circuit and Rb = resistance of field-current input circuit.
Modulation - If the two inputs are sinusoids Ec = Eoc cos
ωct and Eb = Eob cos
ωct, the resulting output product is
Eh/K' = EcEb = EocEob cos ωct
Letting Eoc Eob = Eo and applying the appropriate
Eh/K' = (Eo/2)[cos (ωc
+ ωb)t + cos (ωc
If Ec is a carrier frequency and Eb a modulating signal, Eq.
6 represents a modulated wave. The equation has two sideband terms, (ωc + ωb) and (ωc - ωb) and no carrier
term (a term in ωc only). Thus the resulting output is a suppressed carrier
or balanced modulator signal; the Hall-effect multiplier is inherently a balanced modulator.
Applications - A number of applications employing Hall-effect modulators
have been investigated and three will be described. In all cases the same basic physical
construction was used. A rectangular indium arsenide (InAs) element is cemented to a
ferrite disk and then lapped to the desired thickness. Four electrical connections are
made to the semiconductor element as shown in Fig. 1 B. The ferrite disk-semiconductor
element assembly then becomes an integral part of the magnetic structure, as shown in
Fig. 1C. The magnetic field through the semiconductor element is produced by a current
flowing in a coil wound on a bobbin which is mounted around the center ferrite post of
Fig. 1 - Output of Hall-effect device (A) is a voltage proportional
to the product of control current and magnetic flux. Electrical connections to semiconductor
block (B) and cross section of multiplier (C). The magnetic circuit is operated in its
linear region to keep saturation nonlinearities from affecting the output.
In one application a carrier frequency of approximately 1-Mc is modulated with a fixed
frequency of 400 cps. Theoretically, either signal could be applied to either input.
The practical choice, however, is to use the carrier frequency as the control current
and the 400 cps as the magnetic-circuit drive, as shown in Fig. 2A. Core losses in the
ferrite material used would be high at 1-Mc whereas the semiconductor element is essentially
a pure resistance. The magnetic field coil is then series resonated to minimize the input
power. Output is applied to a load of approximately 15 pf. Since input frequencies are
fixed, it is possible to resonate the capacitance with a high-Q inductance that is link-coupled
to the output of the Hall-effect multiplier.
With no modulating voltage applied, but with maximum carrier input, the output voltage
is nulled with R1. This minimizes the in-phase component of what is generally
called the zero-field voltage. This voltage also contains a quadrature component that
is eliminated by adjusting C1. After potentiometer R1 is adjusted,
maximum modulating signal amplitude is applied and C1 is adjusted for zero
output at the points of modulation envelope cross-over.
In many Hall-effect modulator applications the leakage component inductively coupled
from the magnetic field to the output must be removed. In this application this component
was eliminated by the narrow-band output circuit.
Modulator output voltage is linear within one percent of full scale from zero to peak-field
excitation of ±12 ampere-turns. With 850 milliwatts of carrier power and peak-field
excitation of 12 ampere-turns, a modulated 100 volts peak-to-peak was obtained. The output
could be increased by using a multiplier ferrite core material with a higher saturation
flux density or by using a higher Q output transformer. A 50-percent increase in output
level could be achieved with presently available optimum core materials for both multiplier
and output transformer, with no increase in input power.
Pulse Circuit - In a second application a Hall-effect multiplier
was used to produce bursts of audio-frequency signals, is indicated in Fig. 2B. Audio
response of the unit is from d-c and is down 3db at 20 kc; there is no low-frequency
cutoff. Pulse input requirements are one ampere peak at a maximum duty cycle of 0.1.
For lower duty cycles peak current can be increased, with the restriction that the average
pulse power dissipated in the semiconductor element does not exceed 2 watts. Resistor
R1 provides the audio bandwidth and matches the audio input to a particular
voltage source. Resistor R2 matches the pulse input to a 50-ohm pulse source.
Potentiometer R3 is adjusted for minimum pulse output with no audio applied;
potentiometer R4 is adjusted for minimum audio output between pulses. For
both R3 and R4, infinite resolution trimming potentiometers are
Fig. 2 - Balanced-Modulator circuit (A) with low frequency applied
to the inductive magnetic circuit and high frequency applied to the resistive semiconductor.
Pulse-driven circuit (B) can produce pulses of audio or an audio signal sampled at a
high pulse rate.
Results obtained with one-ampere peak pulses and 10 volts rms audio input include
an output of 350 mv peak-to-peak, with the output more than 65 db down between pulses.
The audio input could be increased to 100 volts rms without distortion, giving an
output of 3.5 volts peak-to-peak. But the audio rejection between pulses would be degraded
by approximately 20 db. Also, the peak pulse current could be increased in accordance
with the power restrictions mentioned. Operation at greater pulse amplitudes with the
audio input voltage held constant would improve audio rejection between pulses. For maximum
audio rejection under any conditions, the pulse source should not have a d-c output level
Oscilloscope photographs of the output waveforms of the modulator are shown and also
the unit packaged as a plug-in module.
In a variation of the device, a pulse repetition rate higher than the audio frequency
was used. Output characteristics are similar to those of the preceding modulator. If
a number of pulses per cycle of audio are desired, the audio range is restricted by the
pulse requirements. For example, at one ampere peak pulse current, if the pulse width
is 10 microseconds and the duty cycle is 0.1, the maximum prf is 10 kilocycles. For ten
pulses or more per cycle of audio under these conditions, the maximum audio frequency
is one kilocycle. By reducing the peak pulse amplitude, a higher duty cycle could be
employed, thereby allowing higher audio frequencies.
A possible application for this mode of operation is the detection of low-frequency
magnetic fields. The physical construction previously described could not be used; instead,
the magnetic field would be applied to the semiconductor element with flux collectors
or magnetic antennas.
Other modulator applications covering a wide range of frequencies have been described
in the literature.5, 6, 7 The potentially rugged simplicity, low cost, and
wide dynamic range of the Hall-effect modulator make it ideal for a wide range of applications
where a true-product, suppressed-carrier device is required.
(1)W. A. Scanga, A. R. Hilbinger, and C. M. Barrack, Hall Effect Multipliers, Electronics,
July 15, 1960, p 64.
(2) G. L. Keister, A Compact Multiplier Puts The Hall Effect to Work, Control Engineering,
Nov., 1955, P 94.
(3) R. P. Chasmar and E. Cohen, An Electrical Multiplier Utilizing The Hall Effect
in Indium Arsenide, Electrical Engineering, Nov., 1958, p 661.
(4) G. S. Glinski and T. P. Landolt, Theory and Practice of Hall Effect Multipliers,
1961 TRE International Convention Record, Part II.
(5) Armour Research Foundation of Illinois Inst. of Technology, "Instrumentation and
Measurement Techniques Study", Signal Corps Contract No. DA 36-039 SC-78269, Quarterly
Progress Report Nos. 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8.
(6) E. Cohen, Hall Effect Multiplier for Use at Radio Fre-quencies, Eleotronic Engineering,
32 p 558, 1960.
(7) E. Cohen, An Improved Radio Frequency Hall Effect Modulator, Electronic Engineering,
34 p 316, 1962.
Posted September 25, 2018