Please support my efforts by advertising!
Serving a Pleasant Blend of Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow™
Vintage Magazines
Electronics World
Popular Electronics
Radio & TV News
QST | Pop Science
Popular Mechanics
Radio-Craft
Radio-Electronics
Short Wave Craft
Electronics | OFA
Saturday Eve Post
Please Support My Advertisers!

Formulas & Data

Electronics | RF
Mathematics
Mechanics | Physics


About | Sitemap
Homepage Archive

Resources

Articles, Forums Calculators, Radar
Magazines, Museum
Radio Service Data
Software, Videos

Entertainment

Crosswords, Humor Cogitations, Podcast
Quotes, Quizzes

Parts & Services

1000s of Listings

   Software: RF Cascade Workbook | Espresso Engineering Workbook | Cafe Press
RF Stencils for Visio | RF Symbols for Visio | RF Symbols for Office
Aegis Power | Alliance Test | Centric RF | Empower RF | ISOTEC | Reactel | RFCT | San Fran Circuits
Exodus Advanced Communications Best in Class RF Amplifier SSPAs - RF Cafe

Amphenol Polyfoam® Coaxial Cable
January 1962 Radio-Electronics

January 1962 Radio-Electronics

January 1962 Radio-Electronics Cover - RF Cafe[Table of Contents]

Wax nostalgic about and learn from the history of early electronics. See articles from Radio-Electronics, published 1930-1988. All copyrights hereby acknowledged.

Amphenol's introduction of Polyfoam® dielectric material for coaxial cable represented a big improvement from both signal loss (attenuation) and velocity factor. This 1962 Radio-Electronics magazine advertisement promoted its virtues. Its previous dielectric was solid polypropylene having a dielectric constant of 2.26, whereas Polyfoam® claimed 1.50. Velocity factor (VF) is proportional to the inverse square root of the dielectric constant (k); i.e., VF = 1/√k. Hence VFpolypropylene = 0.620, and VFPolyfoam®= 0.816. The lower k value facilitates, for equivalent current handling, a smaller coaxial cable diameter with a lower weight, and is more flexible due to a "softer" dielectric. I could not find a breakdown voltage value for Polyfoam®, as compared to polypropylene's 30 kv-40 kV. Calculation of the characteristic impedance of a coaxial cable involves many parameters, all of which also affect current, voltage and power handling, physical size, flexibility, minimum bend radius, signal propagations velocity, capacitance, group delay, signal attenuation, and more. Nothing's simple.

Amphenol Polyfoam® Coaxial Cable

Amphenol Polyfoam® Coaxial Cable, January 1962 Radio-Electronics - RF CafeHow inert gas bubbles here ...

... give you up to 35% greater signal strength here

When you use Amphenol Polyfoam® coaxial cable, you consistently increase signal strength up to 35% over ordinarily used RG-/U cable. The secret? It's in the new Polyfoam® dielectric material - a cellular polyethylene that uses inert gas as the expanding agent to form tiny, completely enclosed cells in the polyethylene. It gives you a dielectric constant of 1.50 as compared with 2.26 for solid polyethylene - for lower attenuation and minimum capacitance.

That's not all! With Polyfoam® cable, you still utilize minimum diameters. Matter of fact, Polyfoam® cable actually weighs less than standard RG cables.

You're ahead all these ways - and at surprisingly low additional cost - when you use genuine Amphenol Polyfoam® for your coaxial cable requirements. See your authorized Amphenol Distributor. If you don't know who he is, write to Amphenol Distributor Division, 2875 S. 25th Avenue, Broadview, Illinois, or call Columbus 1-2020.

Amphenol Distributor Division / Amphenol-Borg Electronics Corporation

Exodus Advanced Communications Best in Class RF Amplifier SSPAs - RF Cafe
PCB Directory (Manufacturers)

Copper Mountain Technologies (VNA) - RF Cafe